Literature DB >> 10705093

The experimental evaluation of an oral cancer information leaflet.

G M Humphris1, M Duncalf, D Holt, E A Field.   

Abstract

The aims of our series of studies were: (1) to prepare an information leaflet about oral cancer for the general public; (2) to design a questionnaire to assess the level of knowledge about oral cancer; and (3) to evaluate the newly prepared leaflet. A study was conducted for each aim. For study 1, multiple drafts of oral cancer leaflets were distributed for comment and editing. For study 2, a large number of statements (100) about oral cancer were compiled and judged. Redundant items were withdrawn. The final version was administered to criterion groups (students, dentists and the public) to assess reliability and validity. For study 3, a multigroup pre- and post-test randomised design (comprising an experimental and two control groups) was adopted to evaluate knowledge improvement from exposure to the oral cancer leaflet. The participants in each study were as follows: in study 1, questions were judged by the authors, colleagues (n=2) and a non-patient group (n=10); in study 2, undergraduate psychology students (n=41), medical students (n=60), dental students (n=82), members of the public (n=54) and general dental practitioners (n=22) were respondents for the reliability/validity assessment; and in study 3, the dental students and members of the public from the previous study participated. The measure was a true/false 36-item questionnaire with additional demographic questions. In study 1 the Flesch readability index for the leaflet equalled approximately 80, i.e. 'fairly easy'. In study 2 the Kuder-Richardson 20 reliability coefficient of the questionnaire equalled 0.76. Criterion validity was confirmed with general dental practitioners scoring greater knowledge than members of the public (p<0.05). In study 3 participants who had access to the leaflet showed a significant increase in knowledge at post-test in comparison to pre-test. Control group results were supportive of a positive effect from leaflet exposure. In conclusion, the design of a health information leaflet, the assessment of reliability and validity of an associated knowledge questionnaire and evaluation of the influence of such a leaflet should be conducted in a series of planned steps. This approach can be used for other health-related issues which require dissemination of information. Three studies have demonstrated the successful application of this design and evaluation model to the area of oral cancer education.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10705093     DOI: 10.1016/s1368-8375(99)00040-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Oncol        ISSN: 1368-8375            Impact factor:   5.337


  10 in total

1.  Bangladeshi dental students' knowledge, attitudes and behaviour regarding tobacco control and oral cancer.

Authors:  Mohammad Tawfique Hossain Chowdhury; Allan Pau; Ray Croucher
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Quality and use of consumer information provided with home test kits: room for improvement.

Authors:  Janaica E J Grispen; Martine H P Ickenroth; Nanne K de Vries; Trudy van der Weijden; Gaby Ronda
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Development and Validation of an Information Leaflet on Oral Care for Irradiated Patients.

Authors:  Helene Bacher; Ramona Schweyen; Dirk Vordermark; Bernd Leplow; Jeremias Hey
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.711

4.  Campaign awareness and oral cancer knowledge in UK resident adult Bangladeshi: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  R Croucher; S S Islam; H Nunn
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 5.  Effectiveness of Interventions to Improve Oral Cancer Knowledge: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nikhil A Ahuja; Satish K Kedia; Kenneth D Ward; Latrice C Pichon; Weiyu Chen; Patrick J Dillon; Hitesh Navaparia
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 1.771

6.  Development and testing of innovative patient resources for the management of coronary heart disease (CHD): a descriptive study.

Authors:  Julie Redfern; Elizabeth Ellis; Tom Briffa; Saul B Freedman
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-08-06       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Characteristics and predictors of oral cancer knowledge in a predominantly African American community.

Authors:  Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters; Eric Adjei Boakye; Adnan S Hussaini; Nanthiya Sujijantarat; Rajan N Ganesh; Matthew Snider; Devin Thompson; Mark A Varvares
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Oral cancer screening in the Bangladeshi community of Tower Hamlets: a social model.

Authors:  H Nunn; A Lalli; F Fortune; R Croucher
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Patient related factors associated with delayed reporting in oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Mohammad Akram; Shahid Ali Siddiqui; Ahmed Masroor Karimi
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2014-07

10.  The impact of an educational pamphlet on the awareness of parents about 4‒6-year-old children's oral habits and dentofacial discrepancies.

Authors:  Shahla Momeni Danaei; Fatemeh Faghihi; Ali Golkari; Maryam Saki
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2016-03-16
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.