Literature DB >> 10705008

Investigation of the comparative toxicity of 5-FU bolus versus 5-FU continuous infusion circadian chemotherapy with concurrent radiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

M M Thrall1, P Wood, V King, W Rivera, W Hrushesky.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the relative toxicities of bolus versus infusional 5-FU chemotherapy administrated concurrently during external beam irradiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following surgical extirpation.
METHODS: A total of 26 eligible patients were retrospectively identified as having been treated for rectal adenocarcinoma at the Stratton VAMC between 1989 and 1997. A comparative analysis of treatment dose intensities, treatment delays and toxicities in these patients was performed.
RESULTS: Significantly less WBC toxicity was observed in the patients receiving infusional 5-FU chemotherapy. The other toxicities, with the exception of skin toxicity, were generally less frequent in the 5-FU infusional group. When the toxicities were corrected for 5-FU dose intensity, to yield toxicity per mg of 5-FU, statistically significant differences were found for hematological toxicity (WBC and platelets), and for gastrointestinal toxicity (frequency and severity of diarrhea and weight loss). The majority of patients receiving infusional 5-FU therapy were treated using a circadian pattern of treatment peaking around the time of the radiation therapy. Patients receiving infusional 5-FU were able to tolerate over twice the dose intensity as those receiving bolus administration. Local recurrence rate in all patients was 3.8% comparing favorably to other reported studies. Distant recurrence frequency was also acceptable at 34.6% for the group.
CONCLUSION: Infusional 5-FU chemotherapy compared with bolus therapy during pelvic radiation minimizes toxicity to the patient while maximizing the dose of 5-FU that can be delivered. As infusional 5-FU therapy during radiation has previously been shown to increase disease free duration and survival, infusional 5-FU should be considered as an acceptable standard of care to prevent local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma following its resection. Shaping this infusional 5-FU chemotherapy within the day so that most of the daily dose is delivered around the time of the radiation therapy may further modify the toxic therapeutic ratio of combined modality therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10705008     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00456-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  3 in total

1.  The impact of ABCC11 polymorphisms on the risk of early-onset fluoropyrimidine toxicity.

Authors:  S Hamzic; N Wenger; T K Froehlich; M Joerger; S Aebi; C R Largiadèr; U Amstutz
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.550

Review 2.  Fabrication and Use of Poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide)-Based Formulations Designed for Modified Release of 5-Fluorouracil.

Authors:  Nattawut Leelakanok; Sean Geary; Aliasger Salem
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.784

3.  Comparison of the efficacy of oral capecitabine versus bolus 5-FU in preoperative radiotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jae Sung Kim; Jun Sang Kim; Moon June Cho; Wan Hee Yoon; Kye Sang Song
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.153

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.