Literature DB >> 10703929

Risk factors for vertebral deformities in men: relationship to number of vertebral deformities. European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study Group.

A A Ismail1, T W O'Neill, C Cooper, A J Silman.   

Abstract

Recent epidemiological studies suggest a similar overall prevalence of vertebral deformity in men to that in women, though the influence of increasing age on the prevalence of vertebral deformity is less marked in men. However, most affected men have only a single or two vertebral deformities, which may be unrelated to osteoporosis. The aim of this study was to examine the role of risk factors, previously demonstrated to be associated with vertebral osteoporosis in females, in men with single/dual deformities compared to those with multiple deformities. Age stratified random samples of men aged 50 years and over were recruited from population registers in 30 European centers as part of the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study (EVOS). Subjects had a lateral spinal radiograph and the presence of vertebral deformity was determined using the McCloskey algorithm. Lifestyle and other risk factor data were obtained from an interviewer-administered questionnaire. In all 6937 men with a mean age of 64.4 (SD = 8.5) years were studied of whom 738 (10.6%) subjects had one or two deformities, and 109 (1.6%) subjects had three or more deformities. There was a marked increase in the prevalence of multiple vertebral deformities with increasing age, but only a modest effect of age on the prevalence of single deformities. Associations between various risk factors for osteoporosis and vertebral deformity were analyzed separately in men with single/dual vertebral deformity from those with three or more deformities using logistic regression. After adjustment for age, there were statistically significant associations between the following risk factors and multiple deformities: previous hip fracture (odds ratio [OR] 10.5), lack of regular physical activity (OR 2.9), low body mass (OR 2.5), and previous steroid use (OR 2.3). By contrast, there were only weak associations with these same variables in males with single/dual deformities and, apart from poor self-reported general health, all of the 95% confidence intervals spanned unity. There was no difference in the reporting of very heavy levels of physical activity under the age of 50 years between men with single/dual deformities and those with multiple deformities. In conclusion, men with multiple deformities showed a similar pattern of risk factor association to those seen in women with vertebral deformity, in contrast to men with single/dual deformities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10703929     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.2.278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  6 in total

1.  Social disadvantage, bone mineral density and vertebral wedge deformities in the Tasmanian Older Adult Cohort.

Authors:  S L Brennan; T M Winzenberg; J A Pasco; A E Wluka; A G Dobbins; G Jones
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Self-reported everyday physical activities in older people with osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  U A Al-Sari; J H Tobias; E M Clark
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  The relationship between cumulative lifetime ultraviolet radiation exposure, bone mineral density, falls risk and fractures in older adults.

Authors:  M J W Thompson; D A Aitken; P Otahal; J Cicolini; T M Winzenberg; G Jones
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  The discriminative ability of peripheral and axial bone measurements to identify proximal femoral, vertebral, distal forearm and proximal humeral fractures: a case control study.

Authors:  Jackie A Clowes; Richard Eastell; Nicola F A Peel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-06-10       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  [Clinical characteristics of patients under treatment for osteoporosis in a Primary Care Centre. Who do we treat?].

Authors:  Ricardo de Felipe; Cristina Cáceres; Marta Cimas; Gemma Dávila; Silvia Fernández; Tania Ruiz
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 1.137

Review 6.  Determinants of fracture risk in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Nicholas Harvey; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.686

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.