Literature DB >> 10703628

Efficacy of a barrier cream and its vehicle as protective measures against occupational irritant contact dermatitis.

U Berndt1, W Wigger-Alberti, B Gabard, P Elsner.   

Abstract

The actual advantage of barrier creams over bland emollients for skin protection is still hotly debated. In a randomized, double-blinded study, a newly-introduced barrier cream and its moisturizing vehicle were compared regarding their skin compatibility, efficacy and resulting acceptance. Thus, 2 panels of 25 hospital nurses with mild signs of skin irritation were asked to use 1 of the test products provided (verum or vehicle) over a period of 4 weeks. Effects of both types of preparations were studied weekly by clinical examination and the instrumental assessment of bioengineering parameters. Results showed no significant differences between barrier cream and vehicle. In both groups, clinical skin status improved and stratum corneum hydration increased significantly during the study period. Both preparations were tolerated and accepted well, thus showing both skin protection and skin care. These results contribute to the debate as to whether a strict distinction between "skin care" and "skin protection" products is justified. The vehicle alone is capable of positively influencing skin status. Emphasis must be laid on regular, frequent, and correct application of a product for it to be effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10703628     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2000.042002077.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  16 in total

Review 1.  Are barrier creams actually effective?

Authors:  M S Alvarez; L H Brown; R R Brancaccio
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 2.  Effectiveness of skin protection creams as a preventive measure in occupational dermatitis: a critical update according to criteria of evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  Birgitta Kütting; Hans Drexler
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-04-08       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 3.  Occupational skin-protection products--a review.

Authors:  J Kresken; A Klotz
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-05-21       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 4.  Occupational skin-disease data in Europe.

Authors:  Thomas L Diepgen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Percutaneous absorption of aromatic amines in rubber industry workers: impact of impaired skin and skin barrier creams.

Authors:  G Korinth; T Weiss; S Penkert; K H Schaller; J Angerer; H Drexler
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  In vitro evaluation of the efficacy of skin barrier creams and protective gloves on percutaneous absorption of industrial solvents.

Authors:  G Korinth; S Geh; K H Schaller; H Drexler
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  Hand hygiene practices among community Health Officers in Rivers State, Nigeria.

Authors:  O B Braimoh; S E Udeabor
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.927

Review 8.  Problems with trials and intervention studies on barrier creams and emollients at the workplace.

Authors:  Peter-Jan Coenraads; Thomas L Diepgen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-05-24       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  Onychodystrophy and its management.

Authors:  Tilmann Oppel; Hans Christian Korting
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2003-07-01

10.  Effectiveness of skin protection creams in the prevention of occupational dermatitis: results of a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Robert Winker; Bayda Salameh; Sabine Stolkovich; Michael Nikl; Alfred Barth; Elisabeth Ponocny; Hans Drexler; Gerhard Tappeiner
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 3.015

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.