Literature DB >> 10703626

Increase in sensitization to oil of turpentine: recent data from a multicenter study on 45,005 patients from the German-Austrian Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK).

R Treudler1, G Richter, J Geier, A Schnuch, C E Orfanos, B Tebbe.   

Abstract

Contact allergy to oil of turpentine was reported to have become rare. However, the evaluation of standardized data of 45,005 patients tested 1992-1997 in 30 Dermatological Centers associated with the German-Austrian Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) showed an increase in positive patch test reactions to turpentine from 0.5% during the years 1992-1995, up to 1.7% in 1996 and 3.1% in 1997. In particular, 17,347 patients tested in 1996-1997 were evaluated in detail by comparing 431 individuals with positive patch test reactions with the rest of the group found negative to turpentine. Using the so-called MOAHLFA index, the following characteristics were shown. Turpentine allergy (a) was found to be significantly less frequent in men and in patients with occupational dermatitis, (b) showed no difference in its association with atopic dermatitis, (c) patients with turpentine allergy had significantly less symptoms of the hands, more symptoms of the legs or in the face and (d) were significantly more often aged over 60 years. Also, patients sensitized to turpentine had increased rates of additional sensitizations. The definite reason for the increase in turpentine sensitization in the population tested here is not clear. Therefore, a detailed exposure analysis is necessary; the new increase in turpentine allergies may be due to popular topical remedies or household chemicals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10703626     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2000.042002068.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  7 in total

1.  Skin cleansers for occupational use: testing the skin compatibility of different formulations.

Authors:  A Klotz; M Veeger; W Röcher
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-05-24       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  [Allergic and irritant skin and airway diseases in masseurs and medical bath attendants].

Authors:  R Wessbecher; X Baur; I Moll; U Latza
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  [Allergic contact dermatitis from colophony and turpentine in resins of untreated pine wood].

Authors:  D Booken; F W Velten; J Utikal; S Goerdt; C Bayerl
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 0.751

4.  [Decrease in nickel sensitization in young patients--successful intervention through nickel exposure regulation? Results of IVDK, 1992-2001].

Authors:  A Schnuch; J Geier; H Lessmann; W Uter
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 5.  [Facial allergic contact dermatitis. Data from the IVDK and review of literature].

Authors:  A Schnuch; C Szliska; W Uter
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 6.  [Epidemiologic surveillance of contact allergens. The "monitoring series" of IVDK (Information Network ofDermatologic Clinics for Detection and Scientific Evaluation of Contact Allergy].

Authors:  W Aberer; P Komericki; W Uter; B M Hausen; H Lessmann; B Kränke; J Geier; A Schnuch
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 0.751

7.  What is the added value of patch testing with 30 fragrance allergens in addition to the European Baseline series?

Authors:  Rosalie C Krijl; Norbertus A Ipenburg; Sylvie M Franken; Thomas Rustemeyer
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 6.419

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.