Literature DB >> 10703471

Differentiation of recurrent rectal cancer and scarring with dynamic MR imaging.

O Dicle1, F Obuz, H Cakmakci.   

Abstract

The accuracy of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the differentiation of malignant and benign pelvic lesions during follow-up of patients with treated colorectal tumours was evaluated prospectively. 19 patients (11 men, 8 women; age range 35-70 years; mean 57 years) with suspected local recurrence of colorectal malignancy were evaluated with MR imaging. Dynamic MR imaging with axial Turbo-FLASH gradient echo imaging and bolus injection of contrast medium was performed. Dynamic images, each consisting of one slice in the same location, were acquired at 5, 10, 15, 20 and 30 s, and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 10 min. The maximum change in signal intensity (Emax), the acceleration rate of the time-intensity curve (TIC) and the ratio of the signal intensity of the lesions to the signal intensity of the iliac artery (SIL/SIA) were used as the enhancement parameters. The TIC and SIL/SIA ratio at 60 s were found to be valuable in the differential diagnosis; Emax had no significance in differentiating benign and malignant lesions. Sensitivity was 83% for each calculated parameter. SIL/SIA has the highest specificity and accuracy among the parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10703471     DOI: 10.1259/bjr.72.864.10703471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  8 in total

1.  [Recurrent rectal cancer: diagnosis by contrast enhancement in MD-CT].

Authors:  C A Stückle
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Radiation risks associated with serial imaging in colorectal cancer patients: should we worry?

Authors:  Jeong Suk Oh; Jonathan B Koea
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  MRI in T staging of rectal cancer: How effective is it?

Authors:  Mg Mulla; R Deb; R Singh
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2010-05

4.  Routine follow-up by magnetic resonance imaging does not improve detection of resectable local recurrences from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Liviu V Titu; Anthony A Nicholson; John E Hartley; David J Breen; John R T Monson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Whole-body MRI at 1.5 T and 3 T compared with FDG-PET-CT for the detection of tumour recurrence in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  G P Schmidt; A Baur-Melnyk; A Haug; S Utzschneider; C R Becker; R Tiling; M F Reiser; K A Hermann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Pelvic colorectal recurrence: crucial role of radiologists in oncologic and surgical treatment options.

Authors:  P A Georgiou; P P Tekkis; G Brown
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 7.  Detection of recurrent rectal cancer with CT, MRI and PET/CT.

Authors:  O Schaefer; M Langer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 7.034

Review 8.  Rectal cancer staging: focus on the prognostic significance of the findings described by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adriana Dieguez
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 3.909

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.