Literature DB >> 10703127

Six-month results of hyperopic and astigmatic LASIK in eyes with primary and secondary hyperopia.

R L Lindstrom1, D R Hardten, D M Houtman, B Witte, N Preschel, Y R Chu, T W Samuelson, E J Linebarger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism and develop a LASIK nomogram for primary hyperopia or hyperopia secondary to myopic refractive surgery using the VISX STAR S2.
METHODS: Prospective evaluation of LASIK in 46 primary eyes and 29 secondary eyes with fogged manifest sphere from +0.5 diopters (D) to +6.0 D and cylinder from 0 to +5.0 D.
RESULTS: Mean manifest spherical equivalent (SE) in patients with primary hyperopia was +2.50 D +/- 0.93 preoperatively and +0.70 D +/- 1.19 at 6 months. At 6 months, 79% of primary hyperopes had uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/40 or better; 63% were within +/- 1 D of emmetropia. One primary hyperope lost 2 lines of best spectacle-corrected vision (BCVA) at 1 month. Complications included transient epithelial defect (6.5%), epithelial cells in the interface (4.3%), diffuse lamellar keratitis (4.3%), haze (2.2%), and mild irregular astigmatism (2.2%). In those with secondary hyperopia, mean manifest SE was +1.70 D +/- 0.82 preoperatively and -0.27 D +/- 0.95 at 6 months. At 6 months, 83% of secondary hyperopes had UCVA of 20/40 or better; 74% were within +/- 1 D of emmetropia. No secondary hyperope lost > or = 2 lines of BCVA. Complications included intraoperative bleeding (3.4%), intraoperative epithelial defect (3.4%), transient interface debris (3.4%), significant dry eye (3.4%), blood in interface (3.4%), irregular astigmatism (6.9%), slight decentration (6.9%), trace haze (6.9%), mild epithelial ingrowth not requiring removal (3.4%), or corneal irregularity (3.4%).
CONCLUSION: These early data suggest that LASIK for hyperopia from +0.5 to +6 D and astigmatism from 0 to +5 D using the VISX STAR S2 benefits from a nomogram adjusted for preoperative refraction, age, and prior refractive surgery and is safe and effective. Patients with secondary hyperopia achieved more correction than those with primary hyperopia, although the accuracy and predictability of LASIK in both groups has improved with the nomogram adjustments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10703127      PMCID: PMC1298263     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc        ISSN: 0065-9533


  14 in total

1.  Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for low hyperopia: safety and efficacy.

Authors:  W B Jackson; G Mintsioulis; P J Agapitos; E J Casson
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 2.  Laser in situ keratomileusis: literature review of a developing technique.

Authors:  S G Farah; D T Azar; C Gurdal; J Wong
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia.

Authors:  K Ditzen; H Huschka; S Pieger
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Photorefractive keratectomy for hyperopia: six months results in 45 eyes.

Authors:  S M Daya; F R Tappouni; N E Habib
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Laser in situ keratomileusis to correct hyperopia from +4.25 to +8.00 diopters.

Authors:  S Göker; H Er; C Kahvecioglu
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for hyperopia.

Authors:  J P Danjoux; R S Kalski; P Cohen; M A Lawless; C Rogers
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia.

Authors:  C J Argento; M J Cosentino
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Results and complications of laser in situ keratomileusis by experienced surgeons.

Authors:  J M Davidorf; R Zaldivar; S Oscherow
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism.

Authors:  O Ibrahim
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Laser in situ keratomileusis for simple myopic, mixed, and simple hyperopic astigmatism.

Authors:  A S Chayet; R Magallanes; M Montes; S Chavez; N Robledo
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanics and wound healing in the cornea.

Authors:  William J Dupps; Steven E Wilson
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 3.467

2.  One-year follow-up of patients with hyperopia undergoing photorefractive keratectomy with Allegretto WaveLight Eye Q 400.

Authors:  Behrad Shahin; Habib Ojaghi; Firouz Amani
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2022-04

3.  Surgical management of presbyopia.

Authors:  André Am Torricelli; Jackson B Junior; Marcony R Santhiago; Samir J Bechara
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-06

4.  Role of percent peripheral tissue ablated on refractive outcomes following hyperopic LASIK.

Authors:  George Fatseas; Fiona Stapleton; Patrick Versace
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  LASIK complications and the Internet: is the public being misled?

Authors:  Daragh Kennedy Fahey; Julius Weinberg
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2003 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Management of post-LASIK dry eye: a multicenter randomized comparison of a new multi-ingredient artificial tear to carboxymethylcellulose.

Authors:  Avi Wallerstein; W Bruce Jackson; Jeffrey Chambers; Amir M Moezzi; Hugh Lin; Peter A Simmons
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.