Literature DB >> 10703125

Giant papillary conjunctivitis in frequent-replacement contact lens wearers: a retrospective study.

P C Donshik1, A D Porazinski.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A retrospective study was done of 47 patients who wore frequent-replacement contact lenses on a daily basis and replaced them every 1 day to 12 weeks. The incidence of giant papillary conjunctivitis (GPC) was determined, and potential risk factors that may predispose frequent-replacement contact lens wearers to develop GPC were assessed.
METHODS: The records of patients who were fitted with frequent-replacement contact lenses with no prior contact lens experience (September 1993 to February 1997) were reviewed.
RESULTS: Forty-seven of 260 patients met the requirement for inclusion in this study. Ten (21.27%) of the patients developed GPC. The incidence varied according to how often the contact lenses were replaced. Incidence was 36% in patients who replaced their lenses at 4 weeks or longer and 4.5% in patients who replaced their lenses at less than 4 weeks. Lenses were coated more often in patients who replaced their lenses at 4 weeks or longer (pi = .23). A significantly greater number of patients in the GPC group incorporated enzyme into their contact lens care system (pi = .0004). A history of allergy was present, significantly more often in patients who developed GPC (pi = .012). There was no significant difference between the groups for age, sex, average daily wearing time, Food and Drug Administration classification of contact lens material, time in contact lenses from fitting to diagnosis or last follow-up period, or the parameters and fitting characteristics of the contact lenses.
CONCLUSION: The frequency of contact lens replacement appears to be an important variable in development of GPC. Although frequent-replacement contact lenses do not eliminate GPC, patients on a 1-day to 3-week replacement cycle had a significantly lower risk of developing GPC than patients who replaced their lenses at longer intervals. Coating was present less often on lenses replaced every 1 day to 3 weeks. In patients who are at high risk for GPC, replacing lenses at intervals of 1 day to 2 weeks appears to offer a better strategy in avoiding GPC than incorporating enzymatic cleaning into their care system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10703125      PMCID: PMC1298261     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc        ISSN: 0065-9533


  12 in total

Review 1.  The contact lens patient and ocular allergies.

Authors:  P C Donshik; W H Ehlers
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol Clin       Date:  1991

2.  Increased numbers of Langerhans cell and expression of HLA-Dr antigen in the giant papilla of patients with giant papillary conjunctivitis.

Authors:  T H Choi; M K Ko; J K Choe
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-06

3.  Giant papillary conjunctivitis in contact lens wearers.

Authors:  M R Allansmith; D R Korb; J V Greiner; A S Henriquez; M A Simon; V M Finnemore
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Immune responses in monkeys to lenses from patients with contact lens induced giant papillary conjunctivitis.

Authors:  M Ballow; P C Donshik; P Rapacz; R Maenza; H Yamase; L Muncy
Journal:  CLAO J       Date:  1989 Jan-Mar

5.  Complications and symptoms in disposable extended wear lenses compared with conventional soft daily wear and soft extended wear lenses.

Authors:  E C Poggio; M Abelson
Journal:  CLAO J       Date:  1993-01

6.  Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and contact lens intolerance.

Authors:  P Kumar; R Elston; D Black; S Gilhotra; N DeGuzman; K Cambre
Journal:  CLAO J       Date:  1991-01

7.  Comparison of the clinical performance of the Acuvue disposable contact lens and CSI lens in patients with giant papillary conjunctivitis.

Authors:  F A Bucci; M O Lopatynsky; P L Jenkins; A T Mackay; D G Rickert; R M Gold
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  A retrospective study of disposable extended wear lenses in 100 patients: year 2.

Authors:  E Maguen; I Rosner; P Caroline; J I Macy; A B Nesburn
Journal:  CLAO J       Date:  1992-10

9.  Association of giant papillary conjunctivitis with seasonal allergies.

Authors:  C G Begley; A Riggle; J A Tuel
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  A comparison of conventional and disposable extended wear contact lenses.

Authors:  G J Boswall; W H Ehlers; A Luistro; M Worrall; P C Donshik
Journal:  CLAO J       Date:  1993-07
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Treating the ocular component of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and related eye disorders.

Authors:  Leonard Bielory; C H Katelaris; Susan Lightman; Robert M Naclerio
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2007-08-15

Review 2.  Biological and Clinical Implications of Lysozyme Deposition on Soft Contact Lenses.

Authors:  Negar Babaei Omali; Lakshman N Subbaraman; Chantal Coles-Brennan; Zohra Fadli; Lyndon W Jones
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Quantification of individual proteins in silicone hydrogel contact lens deposits.

Authors:  Negar Babaei Omali; Zhenjun Zhao; Hua Zhu; Daniel Tilia; Mark D P Willcox
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 2.367

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.