Literature DB >> 10702922

Evaluation of the EVA descriptor for QSAR studies: 3. The use of a genetic algorithm to search for models with enhanced predictive properties (EVA_GA).

D B Turner1, P Willett.   

Abstract

The EVA structural descriptor, based upon calculated fundamental molecular vibrational frequencies, has proved to be an effective descriptor for both QSAR and database similarity calculations. The descriptor is sensitive to 3D structure but has an advantage over field-based 3D-QSAR methods inasmuch as structural superposition is not required. The original technique involves a standardisation method wherein uniform Gaussians of fixed standard deviation (sigma) are used to smear out frequencies projected onto a linear scale. The smearing function permits the overlap of proximal frequencies and thence the extraction of a fixed dimensional descriptor regardless of the number and precise values of the frequencies. It is proposed here that there exist optimal localised values of sigma in different spectral regions; that is, the overlap of frequencies using uniform Gaussians may, at certain points in the spectrum, either be insufficient to pick up relationships where they exist or mix up information to such an extent that significant correlations are obscured by noise. A genetic algorithm is used to search for optimal localised sigma values using crossvalidated PLS regression scores as the fitness score to be optimised. The resultant models were then validated against a previously unseen test set of compounds and through data scrambling. The performance of EVA_GA is compared to that of EVA and analogous CoMFA studies; in the latter case a brief evaluation is made of the effect of grid resolution upon the stability of CoMFA PLS scores particularly in relation to test set predictions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10702922     DOI: 10.1023/a:1008180020974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of a novel molecular vibration-based descriptor (EVA) for QSAR studies: 2. Model validation using a benchmark steroid dataset.

Authors:  D B Turner; P Willett; A M Ferguson; T W Heritage
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins.

Authors:  R D Cramer; D E Patterson; J D Bunce
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  1988-08-01       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Evaluation of a novel infrared range vibration-based descriptor (EVA) for QSAR studies. 1. General application.

Authors:  D B Turner; P Willett; A M Ferguson; T Heritage
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 4.  Evolutionary algorithms in computer-aided molecular design.

Authors:  D E Clark; D R Westhead
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship of melatonin receptor ligands: a comparative molecular field analysis study.

Authors:  S Sicsic; I Serraz; J Andrieux; B Brémont; M Mathé-Allainmat; A Poncet; S Shen; M Langlois
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1997-02-28       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  EVA: a new theoretically based molecular descriptor for use in QSAR/QSPR analysis.

Authors:  A M Ferguson; T Heritage; P Jonathon; S E Pack; L Phillips; J Rogan; P J Snaith
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Chance factors in studies of quantitative structure-activity relationships.

Authors:  J G Topliss; R P Edwards
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 7.446

8.  Sample-distance partial least squares: PLS optimized for many variables, with application to CoMFA.

Authors:  B L Bush; R B Nachbar
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Cross-validated R2-guided region selection for comparative molecular field analysis: a simple method to achieve consistent results.

Authors:  S J Cho; A Tropsha
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1995-03-31       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  Structure-activity relationships from molecular similarity matrices.

Authors:  A C Good; S S So; W G Richards
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1993-02-19       Impact factor: 7.446

  10 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Genetic algorithm optimization in drug design QSAR: Bayesian-regularized genetic neural networks (BRGNN) and genetic algorithm-optimized support vectors machines (GA-SVM).

Authors:  Michael Fernandez; Julio Caballero; Leyden Fernandez; Akinori Sarai
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 2.943

2.  3D-QSAR illusions.

Authors:  Arthur M Doweyko
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Chemometric analysis of ligand receptor complementarity: identifying Complementary Ligands Based on Receptor Information (CoLiBRI).

Authors:  Scott Oloff; Shuxing Zhang; Nagamani Sukumar; Curt Breneman; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Prediction of pharmacokinetic parameters using a genetic algorithm combined with an artificial neural network for a series of alkaloid drugs.

Authors:  Majid Zandkarimi; Mohammad Shafiei; Farzin Hadizadeh; Mohammad Ali Darbandi; Kaveh Tabrizian
Journal:  Sci Pharm       Date:  2013-09-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.