P J Bagley1, J Selhub. 1. Vitamin Metabolism Laboratory, US Department of Agriculture Jean Mayer Human Nutrition Research Centeron Aging at Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA. pbagley@hnrc.tufts.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Naturally occurring folates exist in multiple forms, differing in pteridine ring structure and number of glutamate residues. The ability to measure these folate coenzymes in tissues and cells gives important information about in vivo folate metabolism. METHODS: Folates were heat-extracted from biological samples. A two-column HPLC system with four-channel coulometric electrochemical detection was used for analysis. An affinity column was used first to purify folates from the extract. Purified folates were eluted from the affinity column onto a phenyl analytical column, utilizing a switching valve, and folate forms were separated using an acetonitrile gradient. RESULTS: Folate forms differing in pteridine ring structure and number of glutamate chain residues were identified by retention time and characteristic response across the channels of the detector. Folates were quantified by comparison to an external calibration mixture. Limits of detection for pentaglutamyl folates ranged from 0.21 pmol for tetrahydrofolate to 0.41 pmol for 5-methyltetrahydrofolate. CVs (n = 5) for peaks containing 9-67 pmol of folate were 0.6-6.4% (within day) and 5.2-8. 4% (between days). CVs (n = 5) for peaks containing 0.9-3.5 pmol folate were 5.7-16% (within day) and 8.4-13% (between days). CONCLUSIONS: This automated HPLC system allows the simultaneous determination of polyglutamyl forms of folates from biological samples, including tetrahydrofolate, 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, formylated folates, and pteroylglutamate. The low detection limits allow analysis of folate form distribution in human samples such as erythrocytes and lymphocytes.
BACKGROUND: Naturally occurring folates exist in multiple forms, differing in pteridine ring structure and number of glutamate residues. The ability to measure these folate coenzymes in tissues and cells gives important information about in vivo folate metabolism. METHODS:Folates were heat-extracted from biological samples. A two-column HPLC system with four-channel coulometric electrochemical detection was used for analysis. An affinity column was used first to purify folates from the extract. Purified folates were eluted from the affinity column onto a phenyl analytical column, utilizing a switching valve, and folate forms were separated using an acetonitrile gradient. RESULTS:Folate forms differing in pteridine ring structure and number of glutamate chain residues were identified by retention time and characteristic response across the channels of the detector. Folates were quantified by comparison to an external calibration mixture. Limits of detection for pentaglutamyl folates ranged from 0.21 pmol for tetrahydrofolate to 0.41 pmol for 5-methyltetrahydrofolate. CVs (n = 5) for peaks containing 9-67 pmol of folate were 0.6-6.4% (within day) and 5.2-8. 4% (between days). CVs (n = 5) for peaks containing 0.9-3.5 pmol folate were 5.7-16% (within day) and 8.4-13% (between days). CONCLUSIONS: This automated HPLC system allows the simultaneous determination of polyglutamyl forms of folates from biological samples, including tetrahydrofolate, 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, formylated folates, and pteroylglutamate. The low detection limits allow analysis of folate form distribution in human samples such as erythrocytes and lymphocytes.
Authors: Linda Jeanguenin; Aurora Lara-Núñez; Anne Pribat; Melissa Hamner Mageroy; Jesse F Gregory; Kelly C Rice; Valérie de Crécy-Lagard; Andrew D Hanson Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2010-10-15 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Josiane Steluti; Christina Reginaldo; Jacob Selhub; Ligi Paul; Regina Mara Fisberg; Dirce Maria Marchioni Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2018-11-02 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: Cornelia M Ulrich; Adetunji T Toriola; Lisel M Koepl; Tracy Sandifer; Elizabeth M Poole; Catherine Duggan; Anne McTiernan; Jean-Pierre J Issa Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2012-08-07 Impact factor: 4.528
Authors: Snehal N Chaudhari; Madhumati Mukherjee; Alexandra S Vagasi; Gaofeng Bi; Mohammad M Rahman; Christine Q Nguyen; Ligi Paul; Jacob Selhub; Edward T Kipreos Journal: Dev Cell Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 12.270
Authors: Regan L Bailey; James L Mills; Elizabeth A Yetley; Jaime J Gahche; Christine M Pfeiffer; Johanna T Dwyer; Kevin W Dodd; Christopher T Sempos; Joseph M Betz; Mary Frances Picciano Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2010-06-23 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Brandon J Eudy; Caitlin E McDermott; Gabriel Fernandez; Clayton E Mathews; Jinping Lai; Robin P da Silva Journal: J Nutr Biochem Date: 2020-03-19 Impact factor: 6.048
Authors: Anne Pribat; Linda Jeanguenin; Aurora Lara-Núñez; Michael J Ziemak; John E Hyde; Valérie de Crécy-Lagard; Andrew D Hanson Journal: J Bacteriol Date: 2009-04-24 Impact factor: 3.490
Authors: Anne Pribat; Ian K Blaby; Aurora Lara-Núñez; Jesse F Gregory; Valérie de Crécy-Lagard; Andrew D Hanson Journal: J Bacteriol Date: 2009-11-06 Impact factor: 3.490