Literature DB >> 10700766

Trochanteric non-union in revision total hip arthroplasty: does it matter?

A Hawkins1, K Midwinter, D A Macdonald.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to assess whether trochanteric non-union is an important factor in revision total hip arthroplasty in terms of postoperative morbidity. We studied prospectively 97 consecutive patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty in the years 1992-1996. All operations were performed by one surgeon through a Charnley trans-trochanteric approach. The patients were followed-up over a period of 1-4 years and at 12 months postsurgery were assessed using a modified scoring system devised by D'Aubigne. Anatomical union of the greater trochanter was assessed by an anterior-posterior pelvic radiograph at 12 months to decide if the greater trochanter was united in the correct anatomical position. The trochanteric non-union rate was 18.5% (18 out of 97 patients). There was no significant difference between the patients in terms of pain, function and satisfaction scores at one year between those with trochanteric union and those without. This study suggests that trochanteric non-union post revision total hip arthroplasty is not a cause of increased morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10700766      PMCID: PMC2503460     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  10 in total

1.  Failure of trochanteric osteotomy in total hip replacement: a comparison of two methods of reattachment.

Authors:  D N Teanby; F P Monsell; R Goel; J C Faux; S K Hardy
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Complications of trochanteric osteotomy. Long-term implications.

Authors:  A Frankel; R E Booth; R A Balderston; J Cohn; R H Rothman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The effects of trochanteric osteotomy on abductor power.

Authors:  R W Nutton; R G Checketts
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1984-03

4.  Re-attachment of the greater trochanter. The use of the trochanter cable-grip system.

Authors:  D M Dall; A W Miles
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1983-01

5.  Results of interlocking wire trochanteric reattachment and technique refinements to prevent complications following total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  H C Amstutz; L L Mai; I Schmidt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Reattachment of the greater trochanter after hip replacement.

Authors:  B M Wroblewski; P Shelley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1985-11

7.  Blood loss and operation time in the Charnley low friction arthroplasty.

Authors:  H del Sel; G Brittain; B M Wroblewski
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1981

8.  Total hip replacement with and without osteotomy of the greater trochanter. Clinical and biomechanical comparisons in the same patients.

Authors:  H J Wiesman; S R Simon; F C Ewald; W H Thomas; C B Sledge
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Chevron osteotomy and single wire reattachment of the greater trochanter in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D J Berry; M E Müller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  A system for trochanteric osteotomy and reattachment for total hip arthroplasty with a ninety-nine percent union rate.

Authors:  N F Jensen; W H Harris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 4.176

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Trochanteric osteotomy versus posterolateral approach: function the first year post surgery. A pilot study.

Authors:  Margot van der Grinten; Max Reijman; Frans C van Biezen; Jan A N Verhaar
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 2.362

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.