Literature DB >> 10700331

The contribution of spinal neuronal changes to development of prolonged, tonic nociceptive responses of the cat induced by subcutaneous bee venom injection.

.   

Abstract

To elucidate neurophysiological mechanisms of persistent pain induced by tissue injury, the present study was designed to investigate the effects of s.c. bee venom injection on responses of the dorsal horn nociceptive neurons and those of behavior in anesthetized and awake cats, respectively. A parallel comparative study was also performed to compare the effects of s.c. bee venom and formalin injections on neuronal responses by using an extracellular single-unit recording technique. The present results showed that s.c. bee venom injection into the peripheral cutaneous receptive field resulted in a protracted, tonic monophase of increase in spike responses of wide-dynamic-range (WDR) neurons for more than 1 h, while injection of the same volume of vehicle did not have such an effect. The mean number of spikes during the 60-min period after bee venom was 6.74+/-2.58 spikes/s (n=10), which showed a significant increase in firing rate over the background activity (2.23+/-0.96 spikes/s). Behavioral observations showed that s.c. bee venom injection into the dorsum of a hind paw also produced a prolonged, tonic single phase of response indicative of pain, suggesting that central neuronal changes may contribute to development of bee venom-induced prolonged, tonic pain in cats. The increased neuronal firing induced by s.c. bee venom could be suppressed by a single dose of i.v. morphine and resumed by naloxone. Blockade of the sciatic nerve with lidocaine resulted in a complete suppression of the bee venom-induced neuronal firing, suggesting that the central neuronal changes following s.c. bee venom are peripherally-dependent. Comparative studies showed that the duration and frequency of the bee venom-induced neuronal responses were comparable to those induced by s.c. formalin; however, responses of WDR neurons to mechanical stimuli applied to the injection site of the two chemical agents were quite different. Bee venom produced a significant enhancement of mechanical responses of WDR neurons, while, on the contrary, formalin produced a desensitization of sensory receptors in the injection site, suggesting that the two tonic pain models may have different underlying mechanisms. Copyright 1998 European Federation of Chapters of the International Association for the Study of Pain.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 10700331     DOI: 10.1016/s1090-3801(98)90034-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pain        ISSN: 1090-3801            Impact factor:   3.931


  11 in total

1.  Spatial and temporal plasticity of synaptic organization in anterior cingulate cortex following peripheral inflammatory pain: multi-electrode array recordings in rats.

Authors:  Yun-Fei Lu; Yan Wang; Ying He; Fu-Kang Zhang; Ting He; Rui-Rui Wang; Xue-Feng Chen; Fei Yang; Ke-Rui Gong; Jun Chen
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 5.203

Review 2.  Melittin, the Major Pain-Producing Substance of Bee Venom.

Authors:  Jun Chen; Su-Min Guan; Wei Sun; Han Fu
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 5.203

3.  Involvement of Rac1 signalling pathway in the development and maintenance of acute inflammatory pain induced by bee venom injection.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Yun-Fei Lu; Chun-Li Li; Wei Sun; Zhen Li; Rui-Rui Wang; Ting He; Fan Yang; Yan Yang; Xiao-Liang Wang; Su-Min Guan; Jun Chen
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 4.  The nociceptive and anti-nociceptive effects of bee venom injection and therapy: a double-edged sword.

Authors:  Jun Chen; William R Lariviere
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 11.685

5.  Roles of peripheral P2X and P2Y receptors in the development of melittin-induced nociception and hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Zhuo-Min Lu; Fang Xie; Han Fu; Ming-Gang Liu; Fa-Le Cao; Jian Hao; Jun Chen
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 3.996

6.  Detection of deterministic behavior within the tissue injury-induced persistent firing of nociceptive neurons in the dorsal horn of the rat spinal cord.

Authors:  Ji-Hong Zheng; Zhong Jian; Jun Chen
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.621

7.  Nociception-induced spatial and temporal plasticity of synaptic connection and function in the hippocampal formation of rats: a multi-electrode array recording.

Authors:  Xiao-Yan Zhao; Ming-Gang Liu; Dong-Liang Yuan; Yan Wang; Ying He; Dan-Dan Wang; Xue-Feng Chen; Fu-Kang Zhang; Hua Li; Xiao-Sheng He; Jun Chen
Journal:  Mol Pain       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 3.395

8.  Region- or state-related differences in expression and activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs) in naïve and pain-experiencing rats.

Authors:  She-Wei Guo; Ming-Gang Liu; Ya-Li Long; Li-Ying Ren; Zhuo-Min Lu; Hou-You Yu; Jun-Feng Hou; Hua Li; Cui-Ying Gao; Xiu-Yu Cui; Yang-Yuan An; Junfa Li; Lan-Feng Zhao; Jun Chen
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  Differential activation of p38 and extracellular signal-regulated kinase in spinal cord in a model of bee venom-induced inflammation and hyperalgesia.

Authors:  Xiu-Yu Cui; Yi Dai; Sheng-Lan Wang; Hiroki Yamanaka; Kimiko Kobayashi; Koichi Obata; Jun Chen; Koichi Noguchi
Journal:  Mol Pain       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 3.395

10.  SDF1-CXCR4 signaling contributes to persistent pain and hypersensitivity via regulating excitability of primary nociceptive neurons: involvement of ERK-dependent Nav1.8 up-regulation.

Authors:  Fei Yang; Wei Sun; Yan Yang; Yan Wang; Chun-Li Li; Han Fu; Xiao-Liang Wang; Fan Yang; Ting He; Jun Chen
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 8.322

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.