Literature DB >> 10699659

A comparison of the effects of hippocampal or prefrontal cortical lesions on three versions of delayed non-matching-to-sample based on positional or spatial cues.

M C Porter1, J A Burk, R G Mair.   

Abstract

We trained rats to perform one of three versions of delayed non-matching-to-sample (DNMS): DNMS between two retractable levers in an enclosed operant chamber; varying-choice DNMS between two arms selected at random on every trial in an uncovered eight-arm radial arm maze; or recurring-choice DNMS between the same two arms on every trial in a covered radial maze (N=33/task). Rats with medial prefrontal cortical lesions showed delay-independent impairments on the retractable lever and recurring-choice tasks, but performed varying-choice DNMS normally. Rats with hippocampal lesions exhibited delay-independent impairments of the retractable lever task and delay-dependent impairments of both radial maze tasks. When rats trained initially to perform recurring choice DNMS were switched to varying choice DNMS, the impairments of both the prefrontal and hippocampal groups were reduced, although hippocampal animals remained significantly impaired. When rats trained initially to perform varying choice DNMS were switched to recurring choice DNMS, the impairment of the hippocampal group was exacerbated while the prefrontal group remained unimpaired. Thus training the prefrontal group to perform the varying choice task first seemed to protect from impairment when these rats were subsequently trained to perform recurring choice DNMS. This protection provides evidence against the possibility that factors related to proactive interference or to temporal discrimination can account for the effects of prefrontal lesions on delayed conditional discriminations involving two response alternatives in fixed locations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10699659     DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(99)00161-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  20 in total

1.  Testosterone impairs the acquisition of an operant delayed alternation task in male rats.

Authors:  Steven L Neese; Susan L Schantz
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 3.587

Review 2.  The reuniens and rhomboid nuclei: neuroanatomy, electrophysiological characteristics and behavioral implications.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Cassel; Anne Pereira de Vasconcelos; Michaël Loureiro; Thibault Cholvin; John C Dalrymple-Alford; Robert P Vertes
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 11.685

3.  The BACHD Rat Model of Huntington Disease Shows Signs of Fronto-Striatal Dysfunction in Two Operant Conditioning Tests of Short-Term Memory.

Authors:  Erik Karl Håkan Clemensson; Laura Emily Clemensson; Olaf Riess; Huu Phuc Nguyen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Involvement of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in spatial memory formation and maintenance in a radial arm maze test in rats.

Authors:  M Mizuno; K Yamada; A Olariu; H Nawa; T Nabeshima
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Major diencephalic inputs to the hippocampus: supramammillary nucleus and nucleus reuniens. Circuitry and function.

Authors:  Robert P Vertes
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 2.453

Review 6.  Limbic circuitry of the midline thalamus.

Authors:  Robert P Vertes; Stephanie B Linley; Walter B Hoover
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Effects of clonidine in the locus coeruleus on prefrontal- and hippocampal-dependent measures of attention and memory in the rat.

Authors:  Robert D Mair; Yueping Zhang; Kathleen R Bailey; Margaret M Toupin; Robert G Mair
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  The dig task: a simple scent discrimination reveals deficits following frontal brain damage.

Authors:  Kris M Martens; Cole Vonder Haar; Blake A Hutsell; Michael R Hoane
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Prefrontal cortex and hippocampus subserve different components of working memory in rats.

Authors:  Taejib Yoon; Jeffrey Okada; Min W Jung; Jeansok J Kim
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Working Memory Performance Correlates with Prefrontal-Hippocampal Theta Interactions but not with Prefrontal Neuron Firing Rates.

Authors:  James M Hyman; Eric A Zilli; Amanda M Paley; Michael E Hasselmo
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.