Literature DB >> 10699515

Cardiac output measurement with an esophageal doppler in critically ill Emergency Department patients.

R M Rodriguez1, K A Berumen.   

Abstract

Cardiac output (CO) is a principal determinant of perfusion in many critically ill patients. The objectives of this study were to determine whether physicians' estimates of CO, or cardiac index (CI), are accurate compared with CO/CI measured by esophageal doppler, and to estimate the physician time necessary for Emergency Department (ED) CO/CI measurement. We prospectively evaluated a convenience sample of critically ill, adult ED patients. Based on all available clinical information, residents and emergency medicine attendings estimated patients' CI as being high, normal, or low. A blinded investigator measured CO/CI using an esophageal doppler probe. Times to achieve optimal doppler signal were recorded. Agreement between physician CI estimates and measured CI values was assessed using the weighted kappa statistic. Thirty-three patients were evaluated. There was no agreement beyond chance between physicians' estimates of CI and measured CI. The mean time for optimal doppler signal was 5.7+/-4.3 min. Physicians' estimates of CI were inaccurate compared with measured CI. Esophageal doppler measurement of CO/CI appears to be practical from a physician time standpoint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10699515     DOI: 10.1016/s0736-4679(99)00187-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0736-4679            Impact factor:   1.484


  4 in total

1.  Applications of minimally invasive cardiac output monitors.

Authors:  Jahan Porhomayon; Gino Zadeii; Samuel Congello; Nader D Nader
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-04-24

2.  Change in stroke volume in response to fluid challenge: assessment using esophageal Doppler.

Authors:  Margareta Roeck; Stephan M Jakob; Thomas Boehlen; Lukas Brander; Rafael Knuesel; Jukka Takala
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-04-09       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Clinical review: New technologies -- venturing out of the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Ronny Otero; A Joseph Garcia
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-11-02       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 4.  Clinical examination for diagnosing circulatory shock.

Authors:  Bart Hiemstra; Ruben J Eck; Frederik Keus; Iwan C C van der Horst
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.687

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.