Literature DB >> 10698808

A placebo-controlled study of fluoxetine versus imipramine in the acute treatment of atypical depression.

P J McGrath1, J W Stewart, M N Janal, E Petkova, F M Quitkin, D F Klein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The atypical subtype of depression appears to be both well validated and common. Although monoamine oxidase inhibitors are effective in treating atypical depression, their side effects and prescription-associated dietary restrictions reduce their suitability as a first-line treatment. The objective of this study was to estimate the efficacy of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine in the treatment of major depression with atypical features.
METHOD: One hundred fifty-four subjects with DSM-IV major depression who met the Columbia criteria for atypical depression were randomly assigned to receive fluoxetine, imipramine, or placebo for a 10-week clinical trial. Imipramine was included because its known efficacy for treatment of atypical depression helped to calibrate the appropriateness of the study group.
RESULTS: In both intention-to-treat and completer groups, the effectiveness of both fluoxetine and imipramine was significantly better than that of placebo. The two medications did not differ from each other in effectiveness. Significantly more patients dropped out of treatment with imipramine than with fluoxetine. Before treatment, patients on average rated themselves as very impaired on psychological dimensions of general health and moderately impaired on physical dimensions, compared with population norms. The self-ratings of patients who responded to treatment essentially normalized on these measures.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite earlier data that SSRIs might be the treatment of choice, fluoxetine appeared to be no better than imipramine in the treatment of atypical depression, although fluoxetine was better tolerated than imipramine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10698808     DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.3.344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0002-953X            Impact factor:   18.112


  17 in total

1.  Recognizing and Treating the Physical Symptoms of Depression in Primary Care.

Authors: 
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2004

2.  Individual Differences in Response to Antidepressants: A Meta-analysis of Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Marta M Maslej; Toshiaki A Furukawa; Andrea Cipriani; Paul W Andrews; Benoit H Mulsant
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 21.596

3.  Genome-wide approaches to antidepressant treatment: working towards understanding and predicting response.

Authors:  Karen Hodgson; Shaista Jeelani Mufti; Rudolf Uher; Peter McGuffin
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 11.117

4.  Benefits from antidepressants: synthesis of 6-week patient-level outcomes from double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trials of fluoxetine and venlafaxine.

Authors:  Robert D Gibbons; Kwan Hur; C Hendricks Brown; John M Davis; J John Mann
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2012-06

5.  Testing atypical depression definitions.

Authors:  Franco Benazzi
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.035

6.  Depression symptom dimensions as predictors of antidepressant treatment outcome: replicable evidence for interest-activity symptoms.

Authors:  R Uher; R H Perlis; N Henigsberg; A Zobel; M Rietschel; O Mors; J Hauser; M Z Dernovsek; D Souery; M Bajs; W Maier; K J Aitchison; A Farmer; P McGuffin
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 7.  Comparative efficacy and risk of harms of immediate- versus extended-release second-generation antidepressants: a systematic review with network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Barbara Nussbaumer; Laura C Morgan; Ursula Reichenpfader; Amy Greenblatt; Richard A Hansen; Megan Van Noord; Linda Lux; Bradley N Gaynes; Gerald Gartlehner
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 8.  Atypical depression: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Chi-Un Pae; Haresh Tharwani; David M Marks; Prakash S Masand; Ashwin A Patkar
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.749

9.  An open-label, rater-blinded, flexible-dose, 8-week trial of escitalopram in patients with major depressive disorder with atypical features.

Authors:  Chi-Un Pae; Prakash S Masand; Kathleen Peindl; Paolo Mannelli; Changsu Han; David M Marks; Ashwin A Patkar
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2008

10.  Estimating drug effects in the presence of placebo response: causal inference using growth mixture modeling.

Authors:  Bengt Muthén; Hendricks C Brown
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.