Literature DB >> 10697061

Efficacy and safety of the oral neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir in treating acute influenza: a randomized controlled trial. US Oral Neuraminidase Study Group.

J J Treanor1, F G Hayden, P S Vrooman, R Barbarash, R Bettis, D Riff, S Singh, N Kinnersley, P Ward, R G Mills.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Previous studies have shown oseltamivir, a neuraminidase inhibitor, to be effective in preventing influenza and treating experimental influenza.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oseltamivir in the treatment of naturally acquired influenza infection.
DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study conducted January through March 1998.
SETTING: Sixty primary care and university health centers throughout the United States. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 629 healthy nonimmunized adults aged 18 to 65 years with febrile respiratory illness of no more than 36 hours' duration with temperature of 38 degrees C or more plus at least 1 respiratory symptom and 1 constitutional symptom.
INTERVENTIONS: Individuals were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment groups with identical appearing pills: oral oseltamivir phosphate, 75 mg twice daily (n = 211) or 150 mg (n = 209) twice daily, or placebo (n = 209). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Duration and severity of illness in individuals infected with influenza.
RESULTS: Two individuals withdrew before receiving medication and were excluded from further analyses. A total of 374 individuals (59.6%) were infected with influenza. Their duration of illness was reduced by more than 30% with both oseltamivir, 75 mg twice daily (median, 71.5 hours; P < .001), and oseltamivir, 150 mg twice daily (median, 69.9 hours; P = .006), compared with placebo (median, 103.3 hours). Severity of illness was reduced by 38% (median score, 597 score-hours; P < .001) with oseltamivir, 75 mg twice daily, and by 35% (median score, 626 score-hours; P < .001) with oseltamivir, 150 mg twice daily, vs placebo (median score, 963 score-hours). Oseltamivir treatment reduced the duration of fever and oseltamivir recipients returned to usual activities 2 to 3 days earlier than placebo recipients (P < or = .05). Secondary complications such as bronchitis and sinusitis occurred in 15% of placebo recipients compared with 7% of combined oseltamivir recipients (P = .03). Among all 629 subjects, oseltamivir reduced illness duration (76.3 hours and 74.3 hours for 75 mg and 150 mg, respectively, vs 97.0 hours for placebo; P = .004 for both comparisons) and illness severity (686 score-hours and 629 score-hours for 75 mg and 150 mg, respectively, vs 887 score-hours for placebo; P < .001 for both comparisons). Nausea and vomiting occurred more frequently in both oseltamivir groups (combined, 18.0% and 14.1%, respectively; P = .002) than in the placebo group (7.4% and 3.4%; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that oral oseltamivir treatment reduces the duration and severity of acute influenza in healthy adults and may decrease the incidence of secondary complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10697061     DOI: 10.1001/jama.283.8.1016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  296 in total

1.  Infections Associated with Health-care Personnel: Vaccine-preventable Diseases and Bloodborne Pathogens.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 2.  Perspectives on antiviral use during pandemic influenza.

Authors:  F G Hayden
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2001-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Prevention and treatment of influenza A and B.

Authors:  B Mintzes; K Bassett; J Wright
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 4.  Current research on respiratory viral infections: Third International Symposium.

Authors:  A C Schmidt; R B Couch; G J Galasso; F G Hayden; J Mills; B R Murphy; R M Chanock
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.970

5.  The use of antimicrobial agents after diagnosis of viral respiratory tract infections in hospitalized adults: antibiotics or anxiolytics?

Authors:  Kevin T Shiley; Ebbing Lautenbach; Ingi Lee
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 6.  Oseltamivir: a review of its use in influenza.

Authors:  K McClellan; C M Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Influenza vaccines: present and future.

Authors:  Peter Palese; Adolfo García-Sastre
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Statins and influenza: can we move forward?

Authors:  Edward E Walsh
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Exploring naphthyl-carbohydrazides as inhibitors of influenza A viruses.

Authors:  Sanmitra Barman; Lei You; Ran Chen; Vlad Codrea; Grace Kago; Ramakrishna Edupuganti; Jon Robertus; Robert M Krug; Eric V Anslyn
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 10.  De vuelta a la clínica: sin justificación no existe pregunta de investigación que valga.

Authors:  Juan O Talavera; Rodolfo Rivas-Ruiz; Marcela Pérez-Rodríguez; Ivonne Analí Roy-Garcia; Lino Palacios-Cruz
Journal:  Gac Med Mex       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 0.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.