Literature DB >> 10696769

Responses of transgenic mouse lines p53(+/-) and Tg.AC to agents tested in conventional carcinogenicity bioassays.

J W Spalding1, J E French, S Stasiewicz, M Furedi-Machacek, F Conner, R R Tice, R W Tennant.   

Abstract

The haplo-insufficient p53 knockout (p53+/-) and zetaglobin v-Ha-ras (Tg.AC) transgenic mouse models were compared to the conventional two rodent species carcinogen bioassay by prospectively testing nine chemicals. Seven of the chemicals classified as carcinogens in the conventional bioassay induced tumors in the liver or kidneys of B6C3F1 mice, and one (pentachlorophenol) also induced tumors in other tissues. Only three chemicals, furfuryl alcohol, pyridine, and pentachlorophenol, induced tumors in rats. The tumorigenic effect of pyridine was seen in F344 rats but not in Wistar strain rats. None of the chemicals induced tumors in the p53+/- transgenic mice, which is consistent with the absence of genotoxicity of these chemicals. Only two of the seven nongenotoxic carcinogens were positive in the Tg.AC model (lauric acid diethanolamine and pentachlorophenol). These results show that these transgenic models do not respond to many chemicals that show strain- or species-specific responses in conventional bioassays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10696769     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/53.2.213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  7 in total

1.  Species and gender differences in the carcinogenic activity of trimethylolpropane triacrylate in rats and mice.

Authors:  Inok Surh; Deepa B Rao; Mark F Cesta; Charles D Hébert; Jill F Mann; Helen Cunny; Grace E Kissling; David Malarkey; Rajendra S Chhabra
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 6.023

Review 2.  The use of genetically modified mice in cancer risk assessment: challenges and limitations.

Authors:  David A Eastmond; Suryanarayana V Vulimiri; John E French; Babasaheb Sonawane
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.635

3.  Evaluation of dichloroacetic acid for carcinogenicity in genetically modified Tg.AC hemizygous and p53 haploinsufficient mice.

Authors:  Grace E Kissling; David E Malarkey; Molly K Vallant; Jerry D Johnson; Milton R Hejtmancik; Ronald A Herbert; Gary A Boorman
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Biological Basis of Differential Susceptibility to Hepatocarcinogenesis among Mouse Strains.

Authors:  Robert R Maronpot
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 1.628

Review 5.  The role of transgenic mouse models in carcinogen identification.

Authors:  John B Pritchard; John E French; Barbara J Davis; Joseph K Haseman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Prediction of rodent nongenotoxic carcinogenesis: evaluation of biochemical and tissue changes in rodents following exposure to nine nongenotoxic NTP carcinogens.

Authors:  Clifford R Elcombe; Jenny Odum; John R Foster; Susan Stone; Susan Hasmall; Anthony R Soames; Ian Kimber; John Ashby
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Sawmill chemicals and carcinogenesis.

Authors:  J Huff
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.