Literature DB >> 10695691

Using clinical evaluation and lung scan to rule out suspected pulmonary embolism: Is it a valid option in patients with normal results of lower-limb venous compression ultrasonography?

A Perrier1, M J Miron, S Desmarais, P de Moerloose, D Slosman, D Didier, P F Unger, A Junod, J V Patenaude, H Bounameaux.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with a low clinical probability of pulmonary embolism (PE) and a nondiagnostic lung scan, the prevalence of PE is theoretically very low. We assessed the safety and usefulness of this association for ruling out PE.
METHODS: We analyzed data from 2 consecutive cohort management studies performed in 2 university hospitals (Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland, and Hospital Saint-Luc, Montreal, Quebec), which enrolled 1034 consecutive patients who came to the emergency department with clinically suspected PE. All patients were submitted to a sequential diagnostic protocol of lung scan, D-dimer testing, lower-limb venous compression ultrasonography (US), and pulmonary angiography in case of inconclusive results of noninvasive workup.
RESULTS: The prevalence of PE was 27.6%. Empirical assessment was accurate for identifying patients with a low likelihood of PE (8.2% prevalence of PE in the low clinical probability category). One hundred eighty patients had a low clinical probability of PE and a nondiagnostic lung scan. Among these patients, US showed deep vein thrombosis in 5. Hence, PE could be ruled out by a low clinical probability, a nondiagnostic lung scan, and a normal US in 175 patients (21.5%). The 3-month thromboembolic risk in these patients was low (1.7%; 95% confidence interval, 0.4%-4.9%).
CONCLUSIONS: Anticoagulant treatment could be safely withheld in patients with a low clinical probability of PE and a nondiagnostic lung scan, provided that the US is normal. This combination of findings avoided pulmonary angiography in 21.5% of patients with suspected PE in this series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10695691     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.160.4.512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  7 in total

1.  British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors: 
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of strategies for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Pierre-Marie Roy; Isabelle Colombet; Pierre Durieux; Gilles Chatellier; Hervé Sors; Guy Meyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-07-30

3.  Comparison of non-invasive diagnostic tests to multi-detector CT pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Naeem Firdous; Prashant Nasa; Avdhesh Bansal; Deven Juneja; Manjit Singh Kanwar; Moti Lal Bera
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dis Res       Date:  2013-02-27

4.  Incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism and of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in patients after a first episode of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Daniela Poli; Elisa Grifoni; Emilia Antonucci; Chiara Arcangeli; Domenico Prisco; Rosanna Abbate; Massimo Miniati
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 5.  Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Clive Kearon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  When to perform CTA in patients suspected of PE?

Authors:  Benoît Ghaye; Robert F Dondelinger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Evaluation of the usefulness of a D dimer test in combination with clinical pretest probability score in the prediction and exclusion of Venous Thromboembolism by medical residents.

Authors:  Tarek Owaidah; Nahlah AlGhasham; Saad AlGhamdi; Dania AlKhafaji; Bandar ALAmro; Mohamed Zeitouni; Fawaz Skaff; Hazzaa AlZahrani; Adher AlSayed; Naser ElKum; Mahmoud Moawad; Ahmed Nasmi; Mohannad Hawari; Khalid Maghrabi
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2014-11-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.