Literature DB >> 10695602

Impact of switching laboratory tests on reported trends in Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

L W Dicker1, D J Mosure, W C Levine, C M Black, S M Berman.   

Abstract

Improvements in the sensitivity and specificity of laboratory testing methods for Chlamydia trachomatis infections in recent years have created potential problems with interpreting data on chlamydia prevalence trends. A switch to a more sensitive test can result in an increase in chlamydia positivity even with no increase in the true disease prevalence. To examine the impact of switching laboratory testing methods on chlamydia positivity trends among women, the authors analyzed data from chlamydia screening programs in family planning clinics in two geographic areas of the United States. Data from 7,287 tests performed in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, indicated a 46% increase in positivity (from 4.1% to 6.0%) when the clinics switched from a nucleic acid probe assay to a ligase chain reaction test. Data from 35,306 tests performed in Oregon and Washington State laboratories showed a 21% increase in positivity (from 3.3% to 4.0%) when clinics switched from a direct immunofluorescent antibody testing procedure to an enzyme immunoassay with negative gray zone confirmation. These increases were within ranges consistent with the variability of the testing methods and occurred primarily in asymptomatic women and in women over age 20 years. Any switch in laboratory testing methods must be considered when interpreting data on chlamydial infection trends.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10695602     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  8 in total

1.  Chlamydia Prevalence Trends Among Women and Men Entering the National Job Training Program From 1990 Through 2012.

Authors:  Emily R Learner; Elizabeth A Torrone; Jason P Fine; Brian W Pence; Kimberly A Powers; William C Miller
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.830

2.  Chlamydia positivity trends among women attending family planning clinics: United States, 2004-2008.

Authors:  Catherine Lindsey Satterwhite; LaZetta Grier; Rachel Patzer; Hillard Weinstock; Penelope P Howards; David Kleinbaum
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Impact of New Sexually Transmitted Disease Diagnostics on Clinical Practice and Public Health Policy.

Authors:  Jeanne M. Marrazzo
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 4.  Strategies to control trachoma.

Authors:  Anu A Mathew; Angus Turner; Hugh R Taylor
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  What is the impact of change in diagnostic test method on surveillance data trends in Chlamydia trachomatis infection?

Authors:  F Burckhardt; P Warner; H Young
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.519

6.  Applying a mixed-integer program to model re-screening women who test positive for C. trachomatis infection.

Authors:  Guoyu Tao; Bartholomew K Abban; Thomas L Gift; Guantao Chen; Kathleen L Irwin
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2004-05

Review 7.  Reproducibility and specificity concerns associated with nucleic acid amplification tests for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  A Hadgu; M Sternberg
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-07-19       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Measure of HIV/STD risk-reduction: strategies for enhancing the utility of behavioral and biological outcome measures for African American couples.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 3.731

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.