INTRODUCTION: Sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) associated with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (CMP) is uncommon. Optimal approaches to catheter mapping and ablation are not well characterized, but they are likely to depend on the VT mechanism. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanisms of sustained monomorphic VT encountered in nonischemic CMP and to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of catheter radiofrequency ablation for treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-six consecutive patients with nonischemic CMP referred for management of recurrent VT were studied. In 16 (62%) patients, VT was related to a region of abnormal electrograms consistent with scar and the response to pacing suggested a reentrant mechanism. In 5 (19%) patients, VT was due to bundle branch or interfascicular reentry. In 7 (27%) patients, the VT mechanism was focal automaticity, 4 of whom had evidence of tachycardia-induced CMP. After catheter ablation targeting parts of reentrant circuits, VT was not inducible in 8 (53%) of 15 patients with scar-related reentry, was modified in 5 (33%) patients, and still was inducible in 2 (13%) patients. Ablation was successful in 5 of 5 patients with bundle branch reentry and in 6 of 7 patients with a focal automaticity mechanism. Overall, catheter ablation abolished clinical recurrence of VT in 20 (77%) of 26 patients during a follow-up of 15 +/- 12 months. CONCLUSION: Three different mechanisms of VT are encountered in patients with nonischemic CMP. The mapping and ablation approach varies with the type of VT. In this selected population, the overall efficacy was 77%.
INTRODUCTION: Sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) associated with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (CMP) is uncommon. Optimal approaches to catheter mapping and ablation are not well characterized, but they are likely to depend on the VT mechanism. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanisms of sustained monomorphic VT encountered in nonischemic CMP and to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of catheter radiofrequency ablation for treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-six consecutive patients with nonischemic CMP referred for management of recurrent VT were studied. In 16 (62%) patients, VT was related to a region of abnormal electrograms consistent with scar and the response to pacing suggested a reentrant mechanism. In 5 (19%) patients, VT was due to bundle branch or interfascicular reentry. In 7 (27%) patients, the VT mechanism was focal automaticity, 4 of whom had evidence of tachycardia-induced CMP. After catheter ablation targeting parts of reentrant circuits, VT was not inducible in 8 (53%) of 15 patients with scar-related reentry, was modified in 5 (33%) patients, and still was inducible in 2 (13%) patients. Ablation was successful in 5 of 5 patients with bundle branch reentry and in 6 of 7 patients with a focal automaticity mechanism. Overall, catheter ablation abolished clinical recurrence of VT in 20 (77%) of 26 patients during a follow-up of 15 +/- 12 months. CONCLUSION: Three different mechanisms of VT are encountered in patients with nonischemic CMP. The mapping and ablation approach varies with the type of VT. In this selected population, the overall efficacy was 77%.
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Katherine C Wu; Robert G Weiss; David R Thiemann; Kakuya Kitagawa; André Schmidt; Darshan Dalal; Shenghan Lai; David A Bluemke; Gary Gerstenblith; Eduardo Marbán; Gordon F Tomaselli; João A C Lima Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-06-24 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Henry H Hsia; David Lin; William H Sauer; David J Callans; Francis E Marchlinski Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2009-07-29 Impact factor: 1.900