Literature DB >> 10694459

Neuromagnetic localization of CMV generators using incomplete and full-head biomagnetometer.

J Dammers1, A A Ioannides.   

Abstract

Contingent magnetic variation (CMV) data were recorded in three healthy male subjects using a 2 x 37 biomagnetometer system. The experiment was repeated for one of the subjects using a 151 whole-head biomagnetometer; the same auditory GO/NOGO choice reaction time paradigm as in the first experiment was used, extended to include repetitions of identical runs and additional control conditions. Magnetic field tomography was applied to the averaged data of each subject, for each run and condition (e.g., GO/NOGO). An independent estimate of the current density in the brain was obtained every few milliseconds. The slow components were emphasized by integrating the square of the current density vector, pixel by pixel, revealing in each subject activity in the auditory cortex, sensorimotor cortex, inferior prefrontal area, and posterior inferior parietal area. The intersubject variability was large, but looking across subjects the auditory and sensorimotor cortex (which were best covered by the two probes) were consistently identified in each subject as contributing to the generation of the early and late slow CMV components. These findings were confirmed by the whole-head single-subject experiment, in which slow activity was also identified in the supplementary motor area (SMA) and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), areas very likely missed in the first experiment because of the limited view of the twin system. The PCC and particularly the SMA activations were substantially reduced when identical runs were repeated. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10694459     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1999.0524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  4 in total

1.  MEG reveals different contributions of somatomotor cortex and cerebellum to simple reaction time after temporally structured cues.

Authors:  Tim Martin; Jon M Houck; Joel Pearson Bish; Dubravko Kicić; C Chad Woodruff; Sandra N Moses; Dustin C Lee; Claudia D Tesche
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Anticipation of affective image modulates visual evoked magnetic fields (VEF).

Authors:  Keiichi Onoda; Yasumasa Okamoto; Kazuhiro Shishida; Akira Hashizume; Kazutaka Ueda; Akiko Kinoshita; Hidehisa Yamashita; Shigeto Yamawaki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Simultaneous transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and whole-head magnetoencephalography (MEG): assessing the impact of tDCS on slow cortical magnetic fields.

Authors:  Eliana Garcia-Cossio; Matthias Witkowski; Stephen E Robinson; Leonardo G Cohen; Niels Birbaumer; Surjo R Soekadar
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Multilevel Cortical Processing of Somatosensory Novelty: A Magnetoencephalography Study.

Authors:  Gilles Naeije; Thibaut Vaulet; Vincent Wens; Brice Marty; Serge Goldman; Xavier De Tiège
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.