Literature DB >> 10693060

Interventions to increase breast screening uptake: do they make any difference?

J P Sin1, A S St Leger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast screening has an important role in improving survival from breast cancer through early detection and treatment. Increasing uptake of screening in areas of low uptake is important in improving the effectiveness of the national screening programme. This review looks at which initiatives to boost uptake have been successful.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the different interventions to increase breast screening uptake.
METHOD: A systematic review of interventions to promote breast screening uptake was undertaken. Studies were included if uptake was used as an outcome measure of the intervention and if relevant to the UK screening programme.
RESULTS: Twenty eight studies were found among 25 citations. Interventions were grouped into "person directed", "system directed", "social network directed", and "multistrategy" categories. Most were person directed. These interventions were more likely to be effective in boosting uptake, be simple in design, and to have been evaluated by a randomized trial design. Evidence of effectiveness in the other groups is limited both by the number of studies and the study designs. A summary of the interventions reviewed is presented.
CONCLUSIONS: Simple, brief, and effective interventions exist to boost breast screening uptake. More complicated approaches are not necessarily any more effective. These findings also have implications for other population based screening programmes of the future. In inner city areas the best approach to raising uptake rates is likely to be multistrategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10693060     DOI: 10.1136/jms.6.4.170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  8 in total

1.  The Italian health surveillance (SiVeAS) prioritization approach to reduce chronic disease risk factors.

Authors:  Eduardo J Simoes; Sergio Mariotti; Alessandra Rossi; Alicia Heim; Felipe Lobello; Ali H Mokdad; Emanuele Scafato
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Socioeconomic deprivation, travel distance, location of service, and uptake of breast cancer screening in North Derbyshire, UK.

Authors:  Ravi Maheswaran; Tim Pearson; Hannah Jordan; David Black
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Quebec breast cancer screening program: a study of the perceptions of physicians in Laval, Que.

Authors:  Minh-Nguyet Nguyen; Diane Larocque; Daniel Paquette; Alejandra Irace-Cima
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Modelling tool to support decision-making in the NHS Health Check programme: workshops, systematic review and co-production with users.

Authors:  Martin O'Flaherty; Ffion Lloyd-Williams; Simon Capewell; Angela Boland; Michelle Maden; Brendan Collins; Piotr Bandosz; Lirije Hyseni; Chris Kypridemos
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 4.014

5.  Organized breast screening improves reattendance compared to physician referral: a case control study.

Authors:  Ilia Makedonov; Sumei Gu; Lawrence F Paszat
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Interventions to increase mammography screening uptake among women living in low-income and middle-income countries: a protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Ifeoma Jovita Nduka; Izuchukwu Loveth Ejie; Charles Ebuka Okafor; George Uchenna Eleje; Obinna Ikechukwu Ekwunife
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Interventions to increase the uptake of mammography amongst low income women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael P Gardner; Abbey Adams; Mona Jeffreys
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Screening uptake in a well-established diabetic retinopathy screening program: the role of geographical access and deprivation.

Authors:  Graham P Leese; Paul Boyle; Zhiqiang Feng; Alistair Emslie-Smith; John D Ellis
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 17.152

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.