Literature DB >> 10692905

Family support in general practice.

C Goodhart1, S Layzell, A Cook, J Graffy.   

Abstract

At a time when social services are overburdened in Britain, family support in general practice offers one way to fill the gap. In the Well Family Project, a 'family support coordinator' worked within a general practice in Hackney, London. In the first eighteen months she saw 113 clients. Evaluation was by semistructured interviews with a sample of these clients and with professional workers. Comments from those interviewed indicate that the family support was valued. The general practice base was convenient and non-stigmatizing. By adopting a proactive approach, the project was able to work with clients who had previously 'slipped through the net'. Some of the professionals interviewed would have liked to provide the same help, but were unable to do so because of time and other constraints. Family support provided through general practice was well received by vulnerable families. Although there was overlap with the remit of health visitors and social workers, the protected time and the independence of the coordinator enabled clients to obtain the help they wanted. The replicability of this strategy now needs to be assessed.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10692905      PMCID: PMC1297393          DOI: 10.1177/014107689909201009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   5.344


  3 in total

1.  'Babies don't come with a set of instructions': running support groups for mothers.

Authors:  J Gordon; R Robertson; M Swan
Journal:  Health Visit       Date:  1995-04

2.  Parent counselling: an evaluation of a community child mental health service.

Authors:  H Davis; P Spurr
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 8.982

3.  Social relationships and health.

Authors:  J S House; K R Landis; D Umberson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-07-29       Impact factor: 47.728

  3 in total
  4 in total

1.  Long term benefits need to be taken into account when evaluating family support projects.

Authors:  C Goodhart; J Graffy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-10

2.  Social problems, primary care and pathways to help and support: addressing health inequalities at the individual level. Part I: the GP perspective.

Authors:  Jennie Popay; Ute Kowarzik; Sara Mallinson; Sara Mackian; Jacqui Barker
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Facilitating access to voluntary and community services for patients with psychosocial problems: a before-after evaluation.

Authors:  Justin Grayer; John Cape; Lisa Orpwood; Judy Leibowitz; Marta Buszewicz
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 4.  Preparing the prescription: a review of the aim and measurement of social referral programmes.

Authors:  Emily S Rempel; Emma N Wilson; Hannah Durrant; Julie Barnett
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.