OBJECTIVES: To validate a nutritional intervention programme for elderly people living in nursing homes. DESIGN: In a prospective, randomized, controlled study of 88 residents, we determined nutritional status at day 0 and day 60 using a record of dietary intake, anthropometry, hand-grip strength and mini-nutritional assessment. Dietary intake, grip strength and body weight were also recorded at day 30. We divided subjects into four groups according to their mini-nutritional assessment score. Those with a score 24 received no oral supplementation. Those at risk of malnutrition (with a score of 17-23.5) were randomized to oral supplementation. Those with a score <17 received oral supplementation. We recorded the amount of oral supplements consumed daily. RESULTS: Compliance with oral supplementation was good, and daily intake averaged about 400 kcal. The total energy intake on day 60 was significantly higher in both of the groups that received supplements. Following supplementation, most subjects at risk of malnutrition improved their mini-nutritional assessment score and increased their weight (by 1.4 +/- 0.5 kg). Neither the mini-nutritional assessment score nor weight improved in subjects at risk of malnutrition who did not receive supplements. Supplementation in the malnourished group resulted in a mean mini-nutritional assessment score increase (from 13.9 +/- 2.6 to 17.1 +/- 3.9) and a mean weight gain of 1.5 +/- 0.4 kg. CONCLUSION: Oral nutritional supplements are well accepted and result in increased daily protein and energy intake, body weight and nutritional status in most malnourished patients and in those at risk of malnutrition.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To validate a nutritional intervention programme for elderly people living in nursing homes. DESIGN: In a prospective, randomized, controlled study of 88 residents, we determined nutritional status at day 0 and day 60 using a record of dietary intake, anthropometry, hand-grip strength and mini-nutritional assessment. Dietary intake, grip strength and body weight were also recorded at day 30. We divided subjects into four groups according to their mini-nutritional assessment score. Those with a score 24 received no oral supplementation. Those at risk of malnutrition (with a score of 17-23.5) were randomized to oral supplementation. Those with a score <17 received oral supplementation. We recorded the amount of oral supplements consumed daily. RESULTS: Compliance with oral supplementation was good, and daily intake averaged about 400 kcal. The total energy intake on day 60 was significantly higher in both of the groups that received supplements. Following supplementation, most subjects at risk of malnutrition improved their mini-nutritional assessment score and increased their weight (by 1.4 +/- 0.5 kg). Neither the mini-nutritional assessment score nor weight improved in subjects at risk of malnutrition who did not receive supplements. Supplementation in the malnourished group resulted in a mean mini-nutritional assessment score increase (from 13.9 +/- 2.6 to 17.1 +/- 3.9) and a mean weight gain of 1.5 +/- 0.4 kg. CONCLUSION: Oral nutritional supplements are well accepted and result in increased daily protein and energy intake, body weight and nutritional status in most malnourished patients and in those at risk of malnutrition.
Authors: Marilyn J Rantz; Mary Zwygart-Stauffacher; Lanis Hicks; David Mehr; Marcia Flesner; Gregory F Petroski; Richard W Madsen; Jill Scott-Cawiezell Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2011-08-04 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: V Vucea; H H Keller; J M Morrison; L M Duizer; A M Duncan; N Carrier; C O Lengyel; S E Slaughter; C M Steele Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Albert Westergren; Carolina Axelsson; Petra Lilja-Andersson; Christina Lindholm; Karin Petersson; Kerstin Ulander Journal: Food Nutr Res Date: 2009-09-23 Impact factor: 3.894