Literature DB >> 10690669

Appendix perforation by an intrauterine contraceptive device.

E Ohana1, E Sheiner, E Leron, M Mazor.   

Abstract

Perforation of the uterus by an intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) is a rare, and serious complication, occurring in 1/350 to 1/2500 insertions. Perforation by IUDs can involve several neighboring organs such as the bladder and rectosigmoid. We report two cases of IUD perforations involving the appendix, both inserted during lactation. The first case is an asymptomatic patient in early pregnancy and the second is a woman whose original presentation was chronic lower abdominal pain. The presence of copper in the abdominal cavity can lead to adhesion formation and subsequent abdominal pain, bowel obstruction or infertility. Thus, we believe that when an IUD is located in the abdominal cavity it should be removed even in an asymptomatic patient. In addition, these cases might suggest postponing the use of this contraceptive method in lactating women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10690669     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-2115(99)00142-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  10 in total

1.  Asymptomatic far-migration of an intrauterine device into the abdominal cavity: A rare entity.

Authors:  Ozgu Aydogdu; Huseyin Pulat
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Mislocated extrauterine intrauterine devices: Diagnosis and surgical management.

Authors:  Mustafa Kaplanoğlu; Mehmet Bülbül; Tuncay Yüce; Dilek Kaplanoğlu; Meral Aban
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2015-06-01

3.  Intrauterine contraceptive device appendicitis: a case report.

Authors:  Hao-Ming Chang; Teng-Wei Chen; Chung-Bao Hsieh; Chung-Jueng Chen; Jyh-Cherng Yu; Yao-Chi Liu; Kuo-Liang Shen; De-Chuan Chan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Intravesical migration of an intrauterine device detected in a pregnant woman.

Authors:  Migraci Tosun; Handan Celik; Erhan Yavuz; Mehmet B Cetinkaya
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Foreign body granuloma in the anterior abdominal wall mimicking an acute appendicular lump and induced by a translocated copper-T intrauterine contraceptive device: a case report.

Authors:  Maulana Mohammed Ansari; Syed Hasan Harris; Shahla Haleem; Rehan Fareed; Mohammed Feroz Khan
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2009-04-03

6.  Urinary complications of migrated intrauterine contraceptive device.

Authors:  Ahmed S El-Hefnawy; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Yaser Osman; Mahmoud A Bazeed
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-07-14

7.  Intrauterine contraceptive device migration presenting as abdominal wall swelling: a case report.

Authors:  Imtiaz Wani; Adil Syed; Muddasir Maqbool; Iftikhar Bakshi; Hilal Bhat; Faheem Ul Hassan Andrabi; Naveed Mohsin
Journal:  Case Rep Surg       Date:  2011-10-19

8.  Surgical Removal of an Extrauterine Device Migrating to Appendix.

Authors:  Gulsum Uysal; Hakan Nazik; Nefise Tanridan Okçu; Sevtap Seyfettinoglu; Halil Kazgan
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2016-11-03

9.  IUD embedment in the fallopian tube: An unexpected location for a translocated IUD.

Authors:  Alyssa R Goldbach; Sana Hava; Harshad Patel; Mansoor Khan
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2018-06-07

10.  Retained copper fragments following removal of a copper intrauterine device: Two case reports.

Authors:  Marina Dubovis; Naglaa Rizk
Journal:  Case Rep Womens Health       Date:  2020-04-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.