PURPOSE: Screening by only prostate specific antigen (PSA) for prostate cancer was started since PSA had been added to mass screening as one of check lists in 1997 in Isesaki city, Gunma pref. We expected PSA screening to be introduced into other areas. We therefore studied how to perform a screening procedure for prostate cancer as well as discussed our result of the screening conducted lately. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 1,382 out of 1,423 Isesaki citizens who took mass screening aged 40 to 64 were chosen. Regardless of age, men with a serum PSA level equal or larger than 4.1 ng/ml (Tandem R) were selected for second screening since we determined it was a cut-off level for further check-up. Of those men, 38 were requested for second screening and actually only 24 took it. All these men took PSA check-up again, furthermore 23 took transrectal examination (TRE) and/or transrectal ultra sonography (TRUS) except for one of them. The next screening was requested for sixteen of them. Prostate biopsy was conducted for all of them. RESULTS: More old men took screening and were diagnosed prostate cancer. The findings derived from such diagnosis showed one of them aged 50 to 59 and six of them aged 60 to 64 had the cancer. Moreover, four out of twenty with PSA level ranging 4.1 to 10.0 ng/ml and all of three with PSA level over 20.0 ng/ml had the cancer. Five out of sixteen with a positive sign for further PSA check-ups had the cancer. All the three suspect of the cancer by TURS and DRE had prostate cancer. Two of seven with PSA negative showed suspicion of prostate cancer and had the cancer. No neo-adjuvant and total prostatectomy was conducted for four with 4.0 to 10.0ng/ml diagnosed T2N0 M0. One of them with PSA equal or over 20.0 ng/ml was diagnosed T3N0M0. After hormone therapy its PSA decreased to that equal or under 0.5 ng/ml. Total prostatectomy was conducted for it. CONCLUSION: It is not proved that only PSA mass screening for prostatic cancer contributes to detect early cancer and better prognosis cure case. For the proof, it will be nessary that PSA mass screening is examined more people in the wide area. We conclude men aged 65 to 69 also should take PSA check-up based on epidemiological feature of prostatic cancer.
PURPOSE: Screening by only prostate specific antigen (PSA) for prostate cancer was started since PSA had been added to mass screening as one of check lists in 1997 in Isesaki city, Gunma pref. We expected PSA screening to be introduced into other areas. We therefore studied how to perform a screening procedure for prostate cancer as well as discussed our result of the screening conducted lately. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 1,382 out of 1,423 Isesaki citizens who took mass screening aged 40 to 64 were chosen. Regardless of age, men with a serum PSA level equal or larger than 4.1 ng/ml (Tandem R) were selected for second screening since we determined it was a cut-off level for further check-up. Of those men, 38 were requested for second screening and actually only 24 took it. All these men took PSA check-up again, furthermore 23 took transrectal examination (TRE) and/or transrectal ultra sonography (TRUS) except for one of them. The next screening was requested for sixteen of them. Prostate biopsy was conducted for all of them. RESULTS: More old men took screening and were diagnosed prostate cancer. The findings derived from such diagnosis showed one of them aged 50 to 59 and six of them aged 60 to 64 had the cancer. Moreover, four out of twenty with PSA level ranging 4.1 to 10.0 ng/ml and all of three with PSA level over 20.0 ng/ml had the cancer. Five out of sixteen with a positive sign for further PSA check-ups had the cancer. All the three suspect of the cancer by TURS and DRE had prostate cancer. Two of seven with PSA negative showed suspicion of prostate cancer and had the cancer. No neo-adjuvant and total prostatectomy was conducted for four with 4.0 to 10.0ng/ml diagnosed T2N0 M0. One of them with PSA equal or over 20.0 ng/ml was diagnosed T3N0M0. After hormone therapy its PSA decreased to that equal or under 0.5 ng/ml. Total prostatectomy was conducted for it. CONCLUSION: It is not proved that only PSA mass screening for prostatic cancer contributes to detect early cancer and better prognosis cure case. For the proof, it will be nessary that PSA mass screening is examined more people in the wide area. We conclude men aged 65 to 69 also should take PSA check-up based on epidemiological feature of prostatic cancer.