Literature DB >> 10688744

Role of the development scientist in compound lead selection and optimization.

S Venkatesh1, R A Lipper.   

Abstract

The R&D process for bringing drugs from discovery laboratories to the marketplace is undergoing rapid change, as enabled by new technologies and as demanded by the global pharmaceutical business environment. One consequence of the accelerated R&D paradigm is a blurring of the traditional discovery-development interface, which in turn impacts the traditional roles of discovery and development scientists. R&D organizations must find ways to screen out rapidly compounds that have relatively poor probability of successful registration. Quality of development candidates can be favorably influenced by early consideration of "developability" criteria along with receptor-based potency and specificity. Computational approaches and/or high-throughput experimental determinations will be used increasingly to profile compound characteristics which influence "developability." If such criteria are considered at the time of lead selection and optimization, the compound attrition rate during later development should be decreased from the historical norm. This article discusses the emerging role of development scientists during small-molecule lead selection and optimization. The changing role of development scientists also has implications for graduate curricula in the pharmaceutical sciences. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10688744     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6017(200002)89:2<145::AID-JPS2>3.0.CO;2-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0022-3549            Impact factor:   3.534


  25 in total

1.  A physiologic model for simulating gastrointestinal flow and drug absorption in rats.

Authors:  Stefan Willmann; Walter Schmitt; Jörg Keldenich; Jennifer B Dressman
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  Theoretical predictions of drug absorption in drug discovery and development.

Authors:  Patric Stenberg; Christel A S Bergström; Kristina Luthman; Per Artursson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Prediction of in vitro metabolic stability of calcitriol analogs by QSAR.

Authors:  Berith F Jensen; Morten D Sørensen; Anne-Marie Kissmeyer; Fredrik Björkling; Kim Sonne; Søren B Engelsen; Lars Nørgaard
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 4.  Solubilizing excipients in oral and injectable formulations.

Authors:  Robert G Strickley
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 5.  Modelling and simulation in the development and use of anti-cancer agents: an underused tool?

Authors:  Ferdinand Rombout; Leon Aarons; Mats Karlsson; Anthony Man; France Mentré; Peter Nygren; Amy Racine; Hans Schaefer; Jean-Louis Steimer; Iñaki Troconiz; Achiel van Peer
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.745

6.  Predicting oral absorption of drugs: a case study with a novel class of antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  Allen R Hilgers; Donald P Smith; John J Biermacher; Jeffrey S Day; Jana L Jensen; Sandra M Sims; Wade J Adams; Janice M Friis; Joe Palandra; John D Hosley; Eric M Shobe; Philip S Burton
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 7.  Neurobiological applications of small molecule screening.

Authors:  Andras Bauer; Brent Stockwell
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  Physical scientists research biomedicine: a call for caution.

Authors:  Yì-Xiáng J Wáng
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.087

9.  Antitumor efficacy testing in rodents.

Authors:  Melinda G Hollingshead
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Hemodynamic flow improves rat hepatocyte morphology, function, and metabolic activity in vitro.

Authors:  A Dash; M B Simmers; T G Deering; D J Berry; R E Feaver; N E Hastings; T L Pruett; E L LeCluyse; B R Blackman; B R Wamhoff
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.249

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.