| Literature DB >> 10688528 |
Abstract
This response to McNally challenges the notion that scientific controversy should be waged with smear tactics. McNally's anti-EMDR conclusions are contested as premature and based on red herrings, selective neglect of the literature, and erroneous application of scientific principles. The importance of treatment fidelity is highlighted as a way of distinguishing between EMDR studies of widely varying quality.Mesh：
Year: 1999 PMID： 10688528 DOI： 10.1016/s0887-6185(99)00019-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anxiety Disord ISSN： 0887-6185