Literature DB >> 10688508

Does a discrepancy between gestational age determined by biparietal diameter and last menstrual period sometimes signify early intrauterine growth retardation?

T Larsen1, T H Nguyen, G Greisen, G Engholm, H Møller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between gestational age estimated from the last menstrual period (GA(LMP)) or from the biparietal diameter (GA(BPD)), and the subsequent birthweight for gestational age.
DESIGN: Population-based follow up study.
SETTING: Of 21,936 pregnancies contained in the ultrasound database, 16,387 singleton pregnancies with a reliable last menstrual period date and an ultrasound examination between 12 and 22 weeks of gestation were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlation between: 1) birthweight deviation (birthweight-expected weight for gestation); 2) birthweight; and 3) pregnancy length and (GA(LMP)-GA(BPD)). Relative risk of birthweight < 2,500 g and low birthweight for gestation (> 22% below normal weight) related to five levels of discrepancy between (GA(LMP)-GA(BPD)).
RESULTS: (GA(LMP)-GA(BPD)) was not associated with deviation of birthweight related to GA(BPD). However the risk of low birthweight (< 2,500 g) and low birthweight for gestational age was significantly increased when (GA(LMP)-GA(BPD)) was > 7 days.
CONCLUSION: A biparietal diameter smaller than expected from the last menstrual period date is mainly a problem of an error related to estimated time of ovulation. At the same time the relative risk of a low birthweight infant is slightly increased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10688508     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11695.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  4 in total

1.  Correction of systematic bias in ultrasound dating in studies of small-for-gestational-age birth: an example from the Iowa Health in Pregnancy Study.

Authors:  Karisa K Harland; Audrey F Saftlas; Anne B Wallis; Jerome Yankowitz; Elizabeth W Triche; M Bridget Zimmerman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Validation of obstetric estimate using early ultrasound: 2007 California birth certificates.

Authors:  Danielle T Barradas; Patricia M Dietz; Michelle Pearl; Lucinda J England; William M Callaghan; Martin Kharrazi
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.980

3.  Early childhood development when second-trimester ultrasound dating disagrees with last menstrual period: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jagteshwar Grewal; Meghan Wernicke; Jun Zhang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Slow fetal growth between first and early second trimester ultrasound scans and risk of small for gestational age (SGA) birth.

Authors:  Marija Simic; Olof Stephansson; Gunnar Petersson; Sven Cnattingius; Anna-Karin Wikström
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.