Literature DB >> 10688507

Early pregnancy predictors of preterm birth: the role of a prolonged menstruation-conception interval.

J Gardosi1, A Francis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study early pregnancy characteristics as possible risk factors associated with preterm birth.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected maternity data. POPULATION: 21,069 singleton deliveries with record of a specified last menstrual period and a midtrimester dating scan.
SETTING: Catchment area of tertiary centre serving a general maternity population.
METHODS: Univariate and multivariate analysis. Variables included: maternal age; height; weight at first visit; parity; ethnic group; cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption recorded in early pregnancy; history of abortion; history of preterm birth; and discrepancy between menstrual dates and ultrasound dates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adjusted odds ratios for factors associated with preterm birth, stratified according to parity (nulliparae vs multiparae) and gestational age (early preterm, 24-33 weeks; late preterm, 34-36 weeks; all preterm, < 37 weeks). Population attributable risk (aetiologic fraction) of the significant variables for preterm birth.
RESULTS: The overall preterm (< 37 weeks) delivery rate according to scan dates was 7 x 0%. Preterm birth was associated with young (< 20 years), short (< or = 155 cm) and underweight (< or = 52 kg) mothers, non-Europeans, cigarette smokers, previous abortion or previous preterm delivery, and a prolonged menstruation-conception interval. Preterm births which followed the spontaneous onset of labour (72%) had results which were similar to the overall group, while there were too few iatrogenic preterm deliveries for separate analysis. Logistic regression showed that associations varied in different parity and gestational age groups. For nulliparae, smoking was not associated with preterm birth, but it was strongly associated with multiparous women (adjusted OR 1 x 8, 95% CI 1 x 6-2 x 1). A past history of premature delivery had the highest risk for birth before 34 weeks in the index pregnancy (adjusted OR 5 x 1, 95% CI 3 x 4-7 x 6). A discrepancy between menstrual and scan dates of greater than +7 days, suggestive of a prolonged interval between last menstruation and conception, was present in 23 x 3% of all pregnancies, and was associated with an increased risk of preterm delivery in all gestational age categories for nulliparae (adjusted OR 1 x 5, 95% CI 1 x 3-1 x 8) and multiparae (adjusted OR 1 x 9, 95% CI 1 x 6-2 x 2). Because of its high prevalence, this variable constituted a relatively high population-attributable risk for premature birth for both nulliparae (10 x 7%) and multiparae (16 x 6%).
CONCLUSIONS: A discrepancy of more than +7 days between menstrual and scan dates, indicating a prolonged interval between last menstruation and conception, is a significant predictor of preterm birth. This effect is independent of other factors such as maternal age, height, weight and smoking which are also associated with prematurity. In a maternity population with ultrasound scan dates and recorded last menstrual period, this variable can be easily calculated and used as a marker for increased surveillance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10688507     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11694.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  11 in total

1.  Why should preterm births be rising?

Authors:  A H Shennan; S Bewley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-04-22

2.  Smoking during pregnancy according to obstetric complications and parity: results of the EUROPOP study.

Authors:  Cathy Nabet; Nathalie Lelong; Pierre-Yves Ancel; Marie-Josèphe Saurel-Cubizolles; Monique Kaminski
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Correction of systematic bias in ultrasound dating in studies of small-for-gestational-age birth: an example from the Iowa Health in Pregnancy Study.

Authors:  Karisa K Harland; Audrey F Saftlas; Anne B Wallis; Jerome Yankowitz; Elizabeth W Triche; M Bridget Zimmerman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Fetal growth in early pregnancy and risk of delivering low birth weight infant: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Radek Bukowski; Gordon C S Smith; Fergal D Malone; Robert H Ball; David A Nyberg; Christine H Comstock; Gary D V Hankins; Richard L Berkowitz; Susan J Gross; Lorraine Dugoff; Sabrina D Craigo; Ilan E Timor-Tritsch; Stephen R Carr; Honor M Wolfe; Mary E D'Alton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-03-13

Review 5.  Overweight and obesity in mothers and risk of preterm birth and low birth weight infants: systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Sarah D McDonald; Zhen Han; Sohail Mulla; Joseph Beyene
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-07-20

6.  Fetal volume measurements with three dimensional ultrasound in the first trimester of pregnancy, related to pregnancy outcome, a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Nicol A C Smeets; Marc Prudon; Bjorn Winkens; S Guid Oei
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Different Risk Factors for Very Low Birth Weight, Term-Small-for-Gestational-Age, or Preterm Birth in Japan.

Authors:  Naomi Tamura; Tomoyuki Hanaoka; Kumiko Ito; Atsuko Araki; Chihiro Miyashita; Sachiko Ito; Hisanori Minakami; Kazutoshi Cho; Toshiaki Endo; Kazuo Sengoku; Katsuhiko Ogasawara; Reiko Kishi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Fetal size in the second trimester is associated with the duration of pregnancy, small fetuses having longer pregnancies.

Authors:  Synnøve L Johnsen; Tom Wilsgaard; Svein Rasmussen; Mark A Hanson; Keith M Godfrey; Torvid Kiserud
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 9.  Public Health Impact of Legal Termination of Pregnancy in the US: 40 Years Later.

Authors:  John M Thorp
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2012-12-13

10.  Discrepancy between pregnancy dating methods affects obstetric and neonatal outcomes: a population-based register cohort study.

Authors:  Merit Kullinger; Michaela Granfors; Helle Kieler; Alkistis Skalkidou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.