Literature DB >> 10688485

Neck pain and head restraint position relative to the driver's head in rear-end collisions.

J F Chapline1, S A Ferguson, R P Lillis, A K Lund, A F Williams.   

Abstract

This two-year investigation was designed to estimate the incidence of driver neck pain in rear-struck vehicles involved in two-vehicle collisions and to determine the relationship between neck pain and specific vehicle, human, and environmental factors. Neck pain percentages were significantly higher for female (45%) than for male (28%) drivers. For female and male drivers, neck pain likelihood increased as head restraint height decreased below the head's center of gravity, although this effect was significant only for females. Head restraint backset, the horizontal distance measured from the back of the driver's head to the front of the head restraint, was not found to be related to neck pain for female drivers. Backset trends for male drivers could not be evaluated because few male drivers had head restraints that were high enough for backset to be relevant. Reported neck pain decreased for older drivers (females only), drivers in less severe crashes, and drivers in heavier cars (females only); all head restraint analyses were adjusted for these characteristics. Women, and most likely men, in the United States would benefit greatly from international harmonization to European head restraint standards. Until then, both women and men should be encouraged to adjust their adjustable head restraints, if possible, behind their heads' centers of gravity and to sit with the backs of their heads as close as possible to their head restraints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10688485     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-4575(99)00126-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  8 in total

1.  Assessing automobile head restraint positioning in Portland, Oregon.

Authors:  A L Young; B T Ragel; E Su; C N Mann; E H Frank
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.399

2.  Knowledge and application of correct car seat head restraint usage among chiropractic college interns: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  John Am Taylor; Jeanmarie Burke; John Gavencak; Pervinder Panwar
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2005-03

3.  Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Multiple Linear Regression of the Neck Disability Index: Assessment If Subscales Are Equally Relevant in Whiplash and Nonspecific Neck Pain.

Authors:  Arthur C Croft; Bryce Milam; Jade Meylor; Richard Manning
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-05-25

Review 4.  Whiplash associated disorders: a review of the literature to guide patient information and advice.

Authors:  T McClune; A K Burton; G Waddell
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 5.  The role of tissue damage in whiplash-associated disorders: discussion paper 1.

Authors:  Michele Curatolo; Nikolai Bogduk; Paul C Ivancic; Samuel A McLean; Gunter P Siegmund; Beth A Winkelstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  A stochastic model validated with human test data causally associating target vehicle Delta V, occupant cervicocranial biomechanics, and injury during rear-impact crashes.

Authors:  Sean S Kohles; Jonathan W McClaren
Journal:  J Forensic Leg Med       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 1.691

7.  Minor crashes and 'whiplash' in the United States.

Authors:  Adam J Bartsch; Lars G Gilbertson; Vikas Prakash; Douglas R Morr; John F Wiechel
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2008-10

8.  Is Acceleration a Valid Proxy for Injury Risk in Minimal Damage Traffic Crashes? A Comparative Review of Volunteer, ADL and Real-World Studies.

Authors:  Paul S Nolet; Larry Nordhoff; Vicki L Kristman; Arthur C Croft; Maurice P Zeegers; Michael D Freeman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.