Literature DB >> 10688481

Pressure measurements in the spinal canal of post-mortem human subjects during rear-end impact and correlation of results to the neck injury criterion.

A Eichberger1, M Darok, H Steffan, P E Leinzinger, O Boström, M Y Svensson.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to validate the pressure effect theory on human beings during a realistic rear-end impact and to correlate the neck injury criterion to pressure in the spinal canal. Sled experiments were performed using a test setup similar to real rear-end collisions. Test conditions were chosen based on accident statistics and recordings of real accidents. In particular, velocity change and acceleration level were reproduced similar to actual collisions. The head restraint as well as the seat back were adjusted to different positions. Two small pressure transducer were implemented to the spinal canal of postmortem human subjects and pressure measurement similar to the pig experiments (using exactly the same equipment) were performed. A total set of 21 experiments with four different subjects were performed. The subjects were additionally instrumented with triaxial accelerometers that allowed for calculation of the NIC criterion. Results showed that NIC and pressure amplitudes of the CSF correlate well and therefore NIC seems to be able to predict these amplitudes also for human beings. Conclusions whether these pressure effects induce soft tissue neck injuries or not could not be drawn and should be investigated in further research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10688481     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-4575(99)00097-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of the BioRID P3 and the Hybrid III in pendulum impacts to the back--a comparison to human subject test data.

Authors:  A Linder; U Bergman; M Svensson; D Viano
Journal:  Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med       Date:  2000

2.  Biofidelic whole cervical spine model with muscle force replication for whiplash simulation.

Authors:  P C Ivancic; Manohar M Panjabi; S Ito; P A Cripton; J L Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-10-12       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A comparison of biomechanical mechanisms of whiplash injury from rear impacts.

Authors:  A F Tencer; P Huber; S K Mirza
Journal:  Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med       Date:  2003

Review 4.  The role of tissue damage in whiplash-associated disorders: discussion paper 1.

Authors:  Michele Curatolo; Nikolai Bogduk; Paul C Ivancic; Samuel A McLean; Gunter P Siegmund; Beth A Winkelstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  How can animal models inform on the transition to chronic symptoms in whiplash?

Authors:  Beth A Winkelstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Cervical Spine Mechanism for Reproduction of the Biomechanical Behaviours of the Human Neck during Rotation-Traction Manipulation.

Authors:  Yuancan Huang; Shuai Li; Minshan Feng; Liguo Zhu
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2017-11-12       Impact factor: 1.781

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.