PURPOSE: Detrusor instability initiated by increased intra-abdominal pressure that results in incontinence has always been difficult to treat. This form of incontinence may be due to traction on the pelvic nerves when increased abdominal pressure is applied to already weakened pelvic supportive tissue. In most patients pharmacological attempts to correct this problem fail. We describe a pubovaginal sling designed to stabilize the urethrovesical junction during the Valsalva maneuver, which is our treatment of choice for such patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1994 to 1998 we treated 36 patients with a pubovaginal sling procedure for Valsalva induced detrusor instability diagnosed on preoperative urodynamics. The sling material was in situ vaginal wall in 20 cases, free swing vaginal wall in 6, rectus fascia in 4, cadaveric fascia in 3 and synthetic material in 3. Urodynamic evaluation was performed preoperatively in all patients. Followup of 6 months to 4 years involved subjective questions and objective examination. RESULTS: Cure was achieved in 33 of the 36 patients (92%), of whom leak point pressure was less than 50, 50 to 100 and greater than 100 cm. water in 9, 17 and 7, respectively. In the 3 failed cases leak point pressure was 50 to 100 cm water, including 2 in which cotton swab test results were less than 30 degrees. Urge incontinence resolved in 75% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: The pubovaginal sling procedure may cure Valsalva induced detrusor instability. Leak point pressure does not determine which patients do well. Evaluation for hypermobility may help to predict the success or failure of a procedure by identifying those in whom Valsalva induced detrusor instability results from traction on the pelvic nerves.
PURPOSE: Detrusor instability initiated by increased intra-abdominal pressure that results in incontinence has always been difficult to treat. This form of incontinence may be due to traction on the pelvic nerves when increased abdominal pressure is applied to already weakened pelvic supportive tissue. In most patients pharmacological attempts to correct this problem fail. We describe a pubovaginal sling designed to stabilize the urethrovesical junction during the Valsalva maneuver, which is our treatment of choice for such patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1994 to 1998 we treated 36 patients with a pubovaginal sling procedure for Valsalva induced detrusor instability diagnosed on preoperative urodynamics. The sling material was in situ vaginal wall in 20 cases, free swing vaginal wall in 6, rectus fascia in 4, cadaveric fascia in 3 and synthetic material in 3. Urodynamic evaluation was performed preoperatively in all patients. Followup of 6 months to 4 years involved subjective questions and objective examination. RESULTS: Cure was achieved in 33 of the 36 patients (92%), of whom leak point pressure was less than 50, 50 to 100 and greater than 100 cm. water in 9, 17 and 7, respectively. In the 3 failed cases leak point pressure was 50 to 100 cm water, including 2 in which cotton swab test results were less than 30 degrees. Urge incontinence resolved in 75% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: The pubovaginal sling procedure may cure Valsalva induced detrusor instability. Leak point pressure does not determine which patients do well. Evaluation for hypermobility may help to predict the success or failure of a procedure by identifying those in whom Valsalva induced detrusor instability results from traction on the pelvic nerves.