Literature DB >> 10687999

Studies of the latency of pelvic floor contraction during peripheral nerve evaluation show that the muscle response is reflexly mediated.

C J Fowler1, M J Swinn, R J Goodwin, S Oliver, M Craggs.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Whether neuromodulation using an implanted sacral nerve stimulator acts by its effects on pelvic afferent or efferent nerves remains to be determined. However, it has been observed that eliciting an "anal wink" is helpful in the optimal siting of the foraminal stimulating electrode. This observation has been interpreted as indicating that a direct effect on efferent pelvic innervation is an important functional component of the technique. We studied the latency of this motor response to determine whether it is consistent with neuromodulation working via a direct efferent mechanism.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 9 women with urinary retention undergoing the first stage of a stimulator implant (peripheral nerve evaluation). Stimulation was applied to an electrode placed in the S3 foramen and the latency of the response of the striated anal sphincter, a contraction which gives rise to the "anal wink," was measured using a concentric needle electrode placed in the striated part of the anal sphincter.
RESULTS: Mean latency of response was 98 milliseconds (range 52 to 140), which is approximately 10 times longer than would be expected from that resulting from direct motor nerve stimulation.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that anal sphincter contraction observed during peripheral nerve evaluation is the result of an afferent mediated response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10687999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  24 in total

1.  The anal reflex elicited by cough and sniff: validation of a neglected clinical sign.

Authors:  C L H Chan; S Ponsford; M Swash
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 2.  Selection of ideal candidates for neuromodulation in refractory overactive bladder.

Authors:  Ravi Kacker; Anurag K Das
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Combined urinary and faecal incontinence.

Authors:  Dharmesh S Kapoor; Ranee Thakar; Abdul H Sultan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-02-24

4.  A pilot study of chronic pudendal nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence for those who have failed sacral nerve stimulation.

Authors:  G P Thomas; A T George; T C Dudding; R J Nicholls; C J Vaizey
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 5.  How does sacral modulation work best? Placement and programming techniques to maximize efficacy.

Authors:  Bastian Amend; Mahmoud Khalil; Thomas M Kessler; Karl-Dietrich Sievert
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  [Unconventional treatment procedures of the bladder in paraplegia and myelomeningocele].

Authors:  K-D Sievert; T M Kessler; B Amend; G Kiss; J Pannek
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  [Sacral neuromodulation for neurogenic bladder dysfunction].

Authors:  T M Kessler; J Wöllner; M Kozomara; L Mordasini; U Mehnert
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 8.  Does our limited knowledge of the mechanisms of neural stimulation limit its benefits for patients with overactive bladder? ICI-RS 2013.

Authors:  Jerzy B Gajewski; Anthony J Kanai; Linda Cardozo; Youko Ikeda; Irina V Zabbarova
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 9.  [Neuromodulation of lower urinary tract dysfunction].

Authors:  T M Kessler; S de Wachter
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 10.  Neuromodulation and the role of electrodiagnostic techniques.

Authors:  Karen L Noblett
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.