Literature DB >> 10686988

A prospective comparison of systemic-bladder versus portal-enteric drainage in vascularized pancreas transplantation.

R J Stratta1, A O Gaber, M H Shokouh-Amiri, K S Reddy, M F Egidi, H P Grewal, L W Gaber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most pancreas transplants are performed with systemic venous delivery of insulin and bladder drainage of the exocrine secretions (systemic-bladder [S-B]). To develop a more physiologic procedure, we performed pancreas transplantations with portal venous delivery of insulin and enteric drainage of the exocrine secretions (portal-enteric [P-E]).
METHODS: During an 11-month period, we prospectively alternated 32 consecutive pancreas transplant recipients to either S-B (n = 16) or P-E (n = 16) drainage with standardized immunosuppression.
RESULTS: Patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survival rates after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation were 91% S-B versus 92% P-E, 91% S-B versus 92% P-E, and 82% S-B versus 92% P-E, respectively. Pancreas graft survival rates after solitary pancreas transplantation were 80% S-B versus 75% P-E. There were no graft losses either to immunologic or infectious complications in either group, but the incidence of acute rejection was slightly higher in the S-B group (44% S-B vs 31% P-E, P = NS). The cost and length of the initial hospital stay were similar between groups. The incidence of operative complications, major infections, and cytomegalovirus infections were likewise comparable. However, the S-B group was characterized by a slight increase in the number of readmissions, urinary tract infections, and urologic complications. Furthermore, metabolic acidosis and dehydration were more common in the S-B group.
CONCLUSIONS: Pancreas transplantation with P-E drainage can be performed with short-term results comparable to those of transplantation with S-B drainage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10686988     DOI: 10.1067/msy.2000.103160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  7 in total

1.  Successful management of a proximal pancreatic duct fistula following pancreatic transplantation.

Authors:  H Bonatti; W Tabarelli; N Berger; H Wykypiel; W Jaschke; R Margreiter; W Mark
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Exocrine drainage in vascularized pancreas transplantation in the new millennium.

Authors:  Hany El-Hennawy; Robert J Stratta; Fowler Smith
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2016-06-24

3.  Human fibrinogen patches application reduces intra-abdominal infectious complications in pancreas transplant with enteric drainage.

Authors:  J Padillo; A Arjona-Sánchez; J Ruiz-Rabelo; J C Regueiro; M Canis; A Rodriguez-Benot
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  A prospective comparison of simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation with systemic-enteric versus portal-enteric drainage.

Authors:  R J Stratta; M H Shokouh-Amiri; M F Egidi; H P Grewal; A T Kizilisik; N Nezakatgoo; L W Gaber; A O Gaber
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Mycophenolate mofetil: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Melissa Young; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Evolving surgical strategies for pancreas transplantation.

Authors:  David B Leeser; Stephen T Bartlett
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.810

7.  Pancreas Transplantation With Portal-Enteric Drainage for Patients With Endocrine and Exocrine Insufficiency From Extensive Pancreatic Resection.

Authors:  Andrew S Barbas; David P Al-Adra; Nicolas Goldaracena; Martin J Dib; Markus Selzner; Gonzalo Sapisochin; Mark S Cattral; Ian D McGilvray
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2017-08-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.