Literature DB >> 10685984

Risk adjusted and population based studies of the outcome for high risk infants in Scotland and Australia. International Neonatal Network, Scottish Neonatal Consultants, Nurses Collaborative Study Group.

.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes of care in selected neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) for very low birthweight (VLBW) or preterm infants in Scotland and Australia (study 1) and perinatal care for all VLBW infants in both countries (study 2).
DESIGN: Study 1: risk adjusted cohort study; study 2: population based cohort study.
SUBJECTS: Study 1: all 2621 infants of < 1500 g birth weight or < 31 weeks' gestation admitted to a volunteer sample of hospitals comprising eight of all 17 Scottish NICUs and six of all 12 tertiary NICUs in New South Wales and Queensland in 1993-1994; study 2: all 5986 infants of 500-1499 g birth weight registered as live born in Scotland and Australia in 1993-1994. MAIN OUTCOMES: Study 1: (a) hospital death; (b) death or cerebral damage, each adjusted for gestation and CRIB (clinical risk index for babies); study 2: neonatal (28 day) mortality.
RESULTS: Study 1. Data were obtained for 1628 admissions in six Australian NICUs, 775 in five Scottish tertiary NICUs, and 148 in three Scottish non-tertiary NICUs. Crude hospital death rates were 13%, 22%, and 22% respectively. Risk adjusted hospital mortality was about 50% higher in Scottish than in Australian NICUs (adjusted mortality ratio 1.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29 to 1.63, p < 0.001). There was no difference in risk adjusted outcomes between Scottish tertiary and non-tertiary NICUs. After risk adjustment, death or cerebral damage was more common in Scottish than Australian NICUs (odds ratio 1.9, 95% CI 1.5 to 2.5). Both these risk adjusted adverse outcomes remained more common in Scottish than Australian NICUs after excluding all infants < 28 weeks' gestation from the comparison. Study 2. Population based neonatal mortality in infants of 500-1499 g was higher in Scotland (20.3%) than Australia (16.6%) (relative risk 1.22, 95% CI 1.08 to 1. 39, p = 0.002). In a post hoc analysis, neonatal mortality was also higher in England and Wales than in Australia.
CONCLUSIONS: Study 1: outcome was better in the Australian NICUs. Study 2: perinatal outcome was better in Australia. Both results may be consistent, at least in part, with differences in the organisation and implementation of neonatal care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10685984      PMCID: PMC1721047          DOI: 10.1136/fn.82.2.f118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed        ISSN: 1359-2998            Impact factor:   5.747


  27 in total

1.  Perinatal risk and severity of illness in newborns at 6 neonatal intensive care units.

Authors:  D K Richardson; B L Shah; I D Frantz; F Bednarek; L P Rubin; M C McCormick
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Survival and place of delivery following preterm birth: 1994-96.

Authors:  D Field; E S Draper
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Predicting death from initial disease severity in very low birthweight infants: a method for comparing the performance of neonatal units.

Authors:  W Tarnow-Mordi; S Ogston; A R Wilkinson; E Reid; J Gregory; M Saeed; R Wilkie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-06-23

4.  The effects of corticosteroid administration before preterm delivery: an overview of the evidence from controlled trials.

Authors:  P Crowley; I Chalmers; M J Keirse
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1990-01

5.  Neonatal illness severity and new insights into perinatal audit.

Authors:  D K Richardson; W Tarnow-Mordi
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.299

6.  Increased survival and deteriorating developmental outcome in 23 to 25 week old gestation infants, 1990-4 compared with 1984-9.

Authors:  H C Emsley; S P Wardle; D G Sims; M L Chiswick; S W D'Souza
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.747

7.  Birth weight and illness severity: independent predictors of neonatal mortality.

Authors:  D K Richardson; C S Phibbs; J E Gray; M C McCormick; K Workman-Daniels; D A Goldmann
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults.

Authors:  W A Knaus; D P Wagner; E A Draper; J E Zimmerman; M Bergner; P G Bastos; C A Sirio; D J Murphy; T Lotring; A Damiano
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Umbilical cord clamping and preterm infants: a randomised trial.

Authors:  S Kinmond; T C Aitchison; B M Holland; J G Jones; T L Turner; C A Wardrop
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-01-16
View more
  10 in total

1.  An illness severity score and neonatal mortality in retrieved neonates.

Authors:  Simon J Broughton; Andrew Berry; Stephen Jacobe; Paul Cheeseman; William O Tarnow-Mordi; Anne Greenough
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2004-04-16       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 2.  Shared care--is it worth it for the patient?

Authors:  Iolo Doull
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Variable interpretation of ultrasonograms may contribute to variation in the reported incidence of white matter damage between newborn intensive care units in New Zealand.

Authors:  D L Harris; F H Bloomfield; R L Teele; J E Harding
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 4.  Establishing neonatal networks: the reality.

Authors:  Neil Marlow; A Bryan Gill
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 5.747

5.  Behavioural and emotional problems in very preterm and very low birthweight infants at age 5 years.

Authors:  S A Reijneveld; M J K de Kleine; A L van Baar; L A A Kollée; C M Verhaak; F C Verhulst; S P Verloove-Vanhorick
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 6.  The International Network for Evaluating Outcomes (iNeo) of neonates: evolution, progress and opportunities.

Authors:  Prakesh S Shah; Kei Lui; Brian Reichman; Mikael Norman; Satoshi Kusuda; Liisa Lehtonen; Mark Adams; Maximo Vento; Brian A Darlow; Neena Modi; Franca Rusconi; Stellan Håkansson; Laura San Feliciano; Kjell K Helenius; Dirk Bassler; Shinya Hirano; Shoo K Lee
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2019-07

Review 7.  Extremely preterm birth outcome: a review of four decades of cognitive research.

Authors:  Ida Sue Baron; Celiane Rey-Casserly
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 7.444

8.  Nurse staffing in relation to risk-adjusted mortality in neonatal care.

Authors:  Karen E St C Hamilton; Margaret E Redshaw; William Tarnow-Mordi
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-11-06       Impact factor: 5.747

9.  The International Network for Evaluating Outcomes of very low birth weight, very preterm neonates (iNeo): a protocol for collaborative comparisons of international health services for quality improvement in neonatal care.

Authors:  Prakesh S Shah; Shoo K Lee; Kei Lui; Gunnar Sjörs; Rintaro Mori; Brian Reichman; Stellan Håkansson; Laura San Feliciano; Neena Modi; Mark Adams; Brian Darlow; Masanori Fujimura; Satoshi Kusuda; Ross Haslam; Lucia Mirea
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  The cost-effectiveness of directly observed highly-active antiretroviral therapy in the third trimester in HIV-infected pregnant women.

Authors:  Caitlin J McCabe; Sue J Goldie; David N Fisman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.