Literature DB >> 10685904

Maximum daily energy intake: it takes time to lift the metabolic ceiling.

A Kvist1, A Lindström.   

Abstract

Conventionally, maximum capacities for energy assimilation are presented as daily averages. However, maximum daily energy intake is determined by the maximum metabolizable energy intake rate and the time available for assimilation of food energy. Thrush nightingales (Luscinia luscinia) in migratory disposition were given limited food rations for 3 d to reduce their energy stores. Subsequently, groups of birds were fed ad lib. during fixed time periods varying between 7 and 23 h per day. Metabolizable energy intake rate, averaged over the available feeding time, was 1.9 W and showed no difference between groups on the first day of refueling. Total daily metabolizable energy intake increased linearly with available feeding time, and for the 23-h group, it was well above suggested maximum levels for animals. We conclude that both intake rate and available feeding time must be taken into account when interpreting potential constraints acting on animals' energy budgets. In the 7-h group, energy intake rates increased from 1.9 W on the first day to 3.1 W on the seventh day. This supports the idea that small birds can adaptively increase their energy intake rates on a short timescale.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10685904     DOI: 10.1086/316719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool        ISSN: 1522-2152            Impact factor:   2.247


  8 in total

1.  Metabolic consequences of hard work.

Authors:  Jan-Ake Nilsson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Mechanisms promoting higher growth rate in arctic than in temperate shorebirds.

Authors:  Hans Schekkerman; Ingrid Tulp; Theunis Piersma; G Henk Visser
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Ambient temperature does not affect fuelling rate in absence of digestive constraints in long-distance migrant shorebird fuelling up in captivity.

Authors:  Magali Petit; François Vézina; Theunis Piersma
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.200

4.  Interspecific comparison of the performance of soaring migrants in relation to morphology, meteorological conditions and migration strategies.

Authors:  Ugo Mellone; Raymond H G Klaassen; Clara García-Ripollés; Ruben Limiñana; Pascual López-López; Diego Pavón; Roine Strandberg; Vicente Urios; Michalis Vardakis; Thomas Alerstam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Annual cycle and migration strategies of a trans-Saharan migratory songbird: a geolocator study in the great reed warbler.

Authors:  Hilger W Lemke; Maja Tarka; Raymond H G Klaassen; Mikael Åkesson; Staffan Bensch; Dennis Hasselquist; Bengt Hansson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The lunar cycle drives migration of a nocturnal bird.

Authors:  Gabriel Norevik; Susanne Åkesson; Arne Andersson; Johan Bäckman; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Nocturnal foraging lifts time constraints in winter for migratory geese but hardly speeds up fueling.

Authors:  Thomas K Lameris; Adriaan M Dokter; Henk P van der Jeugd; Willem Bouten; Jasper Koster; Stefan H H Sand; Coen Westerduin; Bart A Nolet
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 2.671

8.  Discrete, high-latitude foraging areas are important to energy budgets and population dynamics of migratory leatherback turtles.

Authors:  Bryan P Wallace; Michael Zolkewitz; Michael C James
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.