Literature DB >> 10685746

Malignant perihilar biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatographic findings.

T S Yeh1, Y Y Jan, J H Tseng, C T Chiu, T C Chen, T L Hwang, M F Chen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We studied the efficacy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in the evaluation of malignant perihilar biliary obstructions, with reference to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
METHODS: A total of 40 patients with malignant perihilar biliary obstructions, who underwent both MRCP (Magnetom Vision; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany; projection technique and multislice plus maximum intensity projection) and ERCP examinations, were studied. The study group included hilar cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin tumor) in 26 patients, icteric hepatocellular carcinoma in four patients, gallbladder carcinoma in five patients, and metastasis from other than hepatobiliary origin in five patients. Axial and coronal magnetic resonance (MR) images were added simultaneously to the MRCP. The mean serum bilirubin level on admission was 11.5 mg/ml (range, 2.8-28.5 mg/ml). The presence and extent of malignant biliary obstruction were determined with both MRCP and ERCP following the known criteria: an abrupt and irregular character of a distal narrow segment, a proportionally dilated biliary tree proximally, and an irregularly shaped intraluminal filling defect. The efficacy of the MRCP examination in detecting the presence of biliary obstruction, its anatomical extent, and the underlying cause, respectively, was compared to that of ERCP.
RESULTS: MRCP examination was successfully performed on all patients, whereas ERCP examination was unsuccessful in two patients. Both MRCP and ERCP were very effective in detecting the presence of biliary obstructions (40 of 40 vs. 38 of 38, p = 1.0). MRCP was superior in its investigation of anatomical extent (34 of 40 vs. 24 of 38, p = 0.015) and the cause of the jaundice (31 of 40 vs. 22 of 38, p = 0.023) compared to ERCP. Specifically, the performance of MRCP is promising for the interpretation of cholangiocarcinoma (22 of 26) and gallbladder carcinoma (five of five), but is relatively ineffective for the interpretation of icteric HCC (two of four) and metastasis (two of five).
CONCLUSION: MRCP represented an ideal noninvasive diagnostic tool for the evaluation of malignant perihilar biliary obstructions with reference to ERCP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10685746     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.01763.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  29 in total

Review 1.  The role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected biliary obstruction.

Authors:  Mannudeep Kalra; Dushyant Sahani; Aamir Ahmad; Sanjay Saini
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2002-04

2.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: consensus document.

Authors:  S A Khan; B R Davidson; R Goldin; S P Pereira; W M C Rosenberg; S D Taylor-Robinson; A V Thillainayagam; H C Thomas; M R Thursz; H Wasan
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Focal intrahepatic strictures: a review of diagnosis and management.

Authors:  David Yeo; Marcos Vinicius Perini; Vijayaragavan Muralidharan; Christopher Christophi
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Staging of Klatskin tumours (hilar cholangiocarcinomas): comparison of MR cholangiography, MR imaging, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.

Authors:  Thomas J Vogl; Wolfram O Schwarz; Matthias Heller; Christopher Herzog; Stephan Zangos; Rainer E Hintze; Peter Neuhaus; Renate M Hammerstingl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Trans-peritoneal fine needle aspiration biopsy of hilar cholangiocarcinoma is associated with disease dissemination.

Authors:  Julie K Heimbach; William Sanchez; Charles B Rosen; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 6.  Cholangiocarcinoma and its management.

Authors:  S A Khan; A Miras; M Pelling; S D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Current imaging strategies of primary and secondary neoplasms of the liver.

Authors:  Linda Fielding
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.513

8.  Differential diagnosis of stenosing lesions at the hepatic hilus.

Authors:  Jonathan Koea; Andrew Holden; Kai Chau; John McCall
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  [Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin tumor)].

Authors:  G A Stavrou; M Donati; S Faiss; R M Jenner; K J Niehaus; K J Oldhafer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 10.  Cross-sectional imaging of biliary tumors: current clinical status and future developments.

Authors:  Christoph J Zech; Stefan O Schoenberg; Maximilian Reiser; Thomas Helmberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.