Literature DB >> 10685090

Ruby laser hair removal: evaluation of long-term efficacy and side effects.

V B Campos1, C C Dierickx, W A Farinelli, T Y Lin, W Manuskiatti, R R Anderson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Although several studies on laser-assisted hair removal have been published, data on long-term follow-up are few. The present study investigated the long-term efficacy and safety of normal-mode ruby laser pulses on hair removal. STUDY DESIGN/
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The normal-mode ruby laser (Epilaser; 694 nm, 3 msec) was used to treat a wide range of body sites in 51 volunteers. The mean follow-up after the last treatment was 8.37 months.
RESULTS: Sixty-three percent of the patients had sparse regrowth. The mean fluence used was 46.5 J/cm(2) in patients who had sparse hair regrowth and 39.3 J/cm(2) in patients who had moderate hair regrowth (P = 0.0127). Transient pigmentary changes occurred most frequently in patients with skin type 4.
CONCLUSION: The normal-mode ruby laser is an efficient and safe method for long-term hair reduction, especially in fair-skinned individuals with dark hair. Higher fluences produce greater long-term efficacy. Adverse effects are minimal and transient. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10685090     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9101(2000)26:2<177::aid-lsm8>3.0.co;2-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Surg Med        ISSN: 0196-8092            Impact factor:   4.025


  7 in total

Review 1.  A review of the adverse effects of laser hair removal.

Authors:  S P R Lim; S W Lanigan
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Incidence of acneform reactions after laser hair removal.

Authors:  J J Carter; S W Lanigan
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Control of hair growth using long-pulsed alexandrite laser is an efficient and cost effective therapy for patients suffering from recurrent pilonidal disease.

Authors:  Muhammad Adil Abbas Khan; Ammar Asrar Javed; Karthikeyan Srinivasan Govindan; Sadia Rafiq; Kay Thomas; Lynne Baker; John Kenealy
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Low-fluence vs. standard fluence hair removal: a contralateral control non-inferiority study.

Authors:  Shlomit Halachmi; Moshe Lapidoth
Journal:  J Cosmet Laser Ther       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.247

5.  TRASER--Total Reflection Amplification of Spontaneous Emission of Radiation.

Authors:  Christopher B Zachary; Morgan Gustavsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparison of Permanent Hair Removal Procedures before Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty: Why We Should Consider Laser Hair Removal as a First-Line Treatment for Patients Who Meet Criteria.

Authors:  Nance Yuan; Alexandra Terris Feldman; Patrick Chin; Michael Zaliznyak; Susan Rabizadeh; Maurice M Garcia
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 2.523

7.  Comparative evaluation of long pulse Alexandrite laser and intense pulsed light systems for pseudofolliculitis barbae treatment with one year of follow up.

Authors:  Tahra M Leheta
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.494

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.