BACKGROUND: Fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS)-based anti-gamma (gamma) positive selection and magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS)-based anti-CD45 depletion followed by anti-gamma positive staining have been two of the most frequently used methods to isolate fetal cells from maternal blood. To date, there has been no direct comparison of fetal cell recovery by these two methods. This study was designed to address this issue. METHODS: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed on nucleated anti-gamma positive cells using X and Y probes. Twenty-four maternal blood samples were obtained immediately after elective termination of pregnancy to ensure a detectable number of fetal cells. RESULTS: The yield and purity of fetal nucleated erythrocytes (FNRBCs) was statistically higher in FACS sorted samples (P < 0.01). The specificity of staining for FNRBCs was statistically higher in MACS sorted samples (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The data from this study demonstrate that both techniques have benefits and limitations. FACS has the advantage of having higher yield, higher purity, higher FISH efficiency and ease in microscope analysis, and MACS has the advantage of having higher specificity and less cell loss during FISH. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND: Fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS)-based anti-gamma (gamma) positive selection and magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS)-based anti-CD45 depletion followed by anti-gamma positive staining have been two of the most frequently used methods to isolate fetal cells from maternal blood. To date, there has been no direct comparison of fetal cell recovery by these two methods. This study was designed to address this issue. METHODS: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed on nucleated anti-gamma positive cells using X and Y probes. Twenty-four maternal blood samples were obtained immediately after elective termination of pregnancy to ensure a detectable number of fetal cells. RESULTS: The yield and purity of fetal nucleated erythrocytes (FNRBCs) was statistically higher in FACS sorted samples (P < 0.01). The specificity of staining for FNRBCs was statistically higher in MACS sorted samples (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The data from this study demonstrate that both techniques have benefits and limitations. FACS has the advantage of having higher yield, higher purity, higher FISH efficiency and ease in microscope analysis, and MACS has the advantage of having higher specificity and less cell loss during FISH. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Carolyn A Meyers; Jiajia Xu; Leititia Zhang; Leslie Chang; Yiyun Wang; Greg Asatrian; Catherine Ding; Noah Yan; Erin Zou; Kristen Broderick; Min Lee; Bruno Peault; Aaron W James Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2019-08-16 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: R Huang; T A Barber; M A Schmidt; R G Tompkins; M Toner; D W Bianchi; R Kapur; W L Flejter Journal: Prenat Diagn Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 3.050
Authors: Kee-Hak Lim; Saira Salahuddin; Le Qiu; Hui Fang; Edward Vitkin; Ionita C Ghiran; Mark D Modell; Tamara Takoudes; Irving Itzkan; Eugene B Hanlon; Benjamin P Sachs; Lev T Perelman Journal: Opt Lett Date: 2009-05-01 Impact factor: 3.776
Authors: Nardhy Gomez-Lopez; Roberto Romero; Sonia S Hassan; Gaurav Bhatti; Stanley M Berry; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Percy Pacora; Adi L Tarca Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2019-12-17 Impact factor: 7.561