Literature DB >> 10685027

Conformation of apolipoprotein E both in free and in lipid-bound form may determine the avidity of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins to the LDL receptor: structural and kinetic study.

A D Dergunov1, E A Smirnova, A Merched, S Visvikis, G Siest, V V Yakushkin, V Tsibulsky.   

Abstract

Slow refolding of human apolipoprotein E (apoE) in solution after guanidine- or cholate-induced denaturation followed by dialysis under controlled conditions was investigated using various spectroscopic properties of fluorescein- and dansyl-labeled apolipoprotein molecules. The results suggest that the last phase(s) of apoE refolding in solution include a slow (several hours at 24 degrees C) interconversion of a self-associated 'open' conformer into a more dense 'closed' conformer. The hydrophobic interactions are primarily responsible for the formation of this more compact apoE structure. To visualize the contribution of apolipoprotein conformation and/or the number of 'active' lipid-bound apoE molecules in the reaction of binding to the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLr) by solid-phase binding assay, the complexes of human plasma apolipoprotein or recombinant (rec) apoE3 with dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) or palmitoyloleoylphosphatidylcholine (POPC) varying in size were used. For seven complexes with plasma protein (four DPPC and three POPC complexes), the final phosphatidylcholine (PC)/protein mole ratio ranged from 117 to 279; affinity constant K(a) averaged for both PCs and plotted against this ratio abruptly increased from 3.8 x 10(7) to 3.8 x 10(8) M(-1) with a transition midpoint of 150-180 PC/apoE, mole ratio. Two DPPC complexes with rec protein bind much more efficiently. Complexes with both plasma and rec apoE were able to compete with very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) or low density lipoproteins (LDL) isolated from patients with E3/3 phenotype, for binding to the LDLr. Again, the competition efficiency abruptly increased at the increase in PC content with a transition midpoint of 130 PC/apoE, mole ratio. The transitions observed both in direct and competitive binding assay probably correspond to the abrupt increase in the number of 'active' apoE molecules on the complex surface accompanying the change in the size and/or in the shape of the complexes. The efficiency of apoE and apoB as the corresponding major ligands in the binding reaction of VLDL and LDL to the LDL receptor was compared. VLDL bind to LDLr following a simple encounter complex model, while LDL binding was characterized by a more complex two-step model with an additional isomerization step. The analysis of the binding data led us to suggest the existence of the continuum from several (2-3) apoE molecules on the surface of TG-rich particles that resulted in the increased binding affinity, on average 3.5-fold higher, compared to LDL. The existence of a complex equilibrium between aqueous and different lipid-bound forms of apoE is proposed, in particular, the formation of a transient disc-lipoprotein particle structure during the interaction with LDLr in vivo as well as in LPL-stimulated lipolysis of the lipid phase of the particle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10685027     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-1981(99)00196-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta        ISSN: 0006-3002


  6 in total

Review 1.  The role of microglia in amyloid clearance from the AD brain.

Authors:  C Y Daniel Lee; Gary E Landreth
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.575

2.  Superficial disposition of the N-terminal region of the surfactant protein SP-C and the absence of specific SP-B-SP-C interactions in phospholipid bilayers.

Authors:  I Plasencia; A Cruz; C Casals; J Pérez-Gil
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  Adipocyte LDL receptor-related protein-1 expression modulates postprandial lipid transport and glucose homeostasis in mice.

Authors:  Susanna M Hofmann; Li Zhou; Diego Perez-Tilve; Todd Greer; Erin Grant; Lauren Wancata; Andrew Thomas; Paul T Pfluger; Joshua E Basford; Dean Gilham; Joachim Herz; Matthias H Tschöp; David Y Hui
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 4.  The role of apolipoprotein E in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Jungsu Kim; Jacob M Basak; David M Holtzman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 5.  APOE-modulated Aβ-induced neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease: current landscape, novel data, and future perspective.

Authors:  Leon M Tai; Shivesh Ghura; Kevin P Koster; Vaiva Liakaite; Mark Maienschein-Cline; Pinal Kanabar; Nicole Collins; Manel Ben-Aissa; Arden Zhengdeng Lei; Neil Bahroos; Stefan J Green; Bill Hendrickson; Linda J Van Eldik; Mary Jo LaDu
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 5.372

6.  ApoE promotes the proteolytic degradation of Abeta.

Authors:  Qingguang Jiang; C Y Daniel Lee; Shweta Mandrekar; Brandy Wilkinson; Paige Cramer; Noam Zelcer; Karen Mann; Bruce Lamb; Timothy M Willson; Jon L Collins; Jill C Richardson; Jonathan D Smith; Thomas A Comery; David Riddell; David M Holtzman; Peter Tontonoz; Gary E Landreth
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 17.173

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.