Literature DB >> 10684762

Enteric colonisation following natural exposure to Campylobacter in pigs.

C R Young1, R Harvey, R Anderson, D Nisbet, L H Stanker.   

Abstract

A survey was conducted to establish the prevalence of Campylobacter in pigs from an integrated commercial hog farm. This study was carried out in four different groups of pigs: 1) adult gilts (50); 2) pregnant sows (9); 3) piglets at day-of-birth (73); 4) weaned piglets (20). Rectal and/or caecal samples were collected from each pig. Campylobacter was cultured and enumerated from such samples using Bolton enrichment broth and Campy-Cephex agar plates. Both biochemical and serological tests were used to determine Campylobacter species. Gilts had a 76 per cent incidence of Campylobacter with a mean of 76.3 per cent for C. jejuni, 21 per cent for C. coli and 2.6 per cent for C. lari. Pregnant sows had a 100 per cent incidence of Campylobacter with a mean of 87 per cent for C. jejuni and 13 per cent for C. coli. Newborn piglets had a 57. 8 per cent incidence of Campylobacter, rising to 100 per cent by the time of weaning. Thus it appears that pigs, from the day of birth, are highly susceptible to colonisation by Campylobacter. Copyright 2000 Harcourt Publishers LtdCopyright 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10684762     DOI: 10.1053/rvsc.1999.0335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Vet Sci        ISSN: 0034-5288            Impact factor:   2.534


  9 in total

1.  Neurologic symptoms associated with raising poultry and swine among participants in the Agricultural Health Study.

Authors:  Meghan F Davis; Freya Kamel; Jane A Hoppin; Michael C R Alavanja; Laura Beane Freeman; Gregory C Gray; Kenrad Nelson; Ellen Silbergeld
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.162

2.  Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant campylobacter strains in distinct Swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment.

Authors:  Macarena P Quintana-Hayashi; Siddhartha Thakur
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Pet dogs and chicken meat as reservoirs of Campylobacter spp. in Barbados.

Authors:  Suzanne N Workman; George E Mathison; Marc C Lavoie
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Microbiome profiling of commercial pigs from farrow to finish.

Authors:  Brenda De Rodas; Bonnie P Youmans; Jessica L Danzeisen; Huyen Tran; Timothy J Johnson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Rapid identification and quantification of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni by real-time PCR in pure cultures and in complex samples.

Authors:  Mily Leblanc-Maridor; François Beaudeau; Henri Seegers; Martine Denis; Catherine Belloc
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-22       Impact factor: 3.605

6.  Pathogen survival trajectories: an eco-environmental approach to the modeling of human campylobacteriosis ecology.

Authors:  Chris Skelly; Phil Weinstein
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Prevalence, antibiogram and risk factors of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in dressed porcine carcass of Chitwan, Nepal.

Authors:  Laxman Ghimire; Dinesh Kumar Singh; Hom Bahadur Basnet; Rebanta Kumar Bhattarai; Santosh Dhakal; Bishwas Sharma
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 3.605

Review 8.  Foodborne Campylobacter: infections, metabolism, pathogenesis and reservoirs.

Authors:  Sharon V R Epps; Roger B Harvey; Michael E Hume; Timothy D Phillips; Robin C Anderson; David J Nisbet
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  Campylobacter: from microbiology to prevention.

Authors:  A Facciolà; R Riso; E Avventuroso; G Visalli; S A Delia; P Laganà
Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg       Date:  2017-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.