Literature DB >> 10683101

Energetically optimal cadence vs. freely-chosen cadence during cycling: effect of exercise duration.

J Brisswalter1, C Hausswirth, D Smith, F Vercruyssen, J M Vallier.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between cadence and oxygen consumption with exercise duration. Ten triathletes who trained regularly were examined. The first test was always a maximal test to determine maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max). The other sessions were composed of six submaximal tests representing 80% of the maximal power reached with VO2max (Pmax). During these tests submaximal rides with a duration of 30 min were performed. Each test represented, in a randomised order, one of the following pedal rates: 50, 65, 80, 95, 110 rpm and a freely-chosen rate. VO2, respiratory parameters, and heart rate were monitored continuously. Two periods, between the 3rd and the 6th minute and between the 25th and the 28th minute, were analysed. Results showed that when VO2 and heart rate were plotted against cadence, each curve could be best described by a parabolic function, whatever the period. Furthermore, a significant effect of period was found on energetically optimal cadence (70 +/- 4.5 vs. 86 +/- 6.2 rpm, P < 0.05). Only during the second period was no significant difference found between freely-chosen cadence (83 +/- 6.9 rpm) and energetically optimal cadence (P > 0.05). In conclusion, our results suggest that during prolonged exercise triathletes choose a cadence that is close to the energetically optimal cadence. A change of muscle fibre recruitment pattern with exercise duration and cadence would explain the shift in energetically optimal rate towards a higher pedal rate observed at the end of exercise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10683101     DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-8857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  24 in total

Review 1.  Specific aspects of contemporary triathlon: implications for physiological analysis and performance.

Authors:  David J Bentley; Grégoire P Millet; Verónica E Vleck; Lars R McNaughton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Effect of cycling cadence on subsequent 3 km running performance in well trained triathletes.

Authors:  T Bernard; F Vercruyssen; F Grego; C Hausswirth; R Lepers; J-M Vallier; J Brisswalter
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 3.  Effects of acute physical exercise characteristics on cognitive performance.

Authors:  Jeanick Brisswalter; Maya Collardeau; Arcelin René
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Pedalling rate affects endurance performance during high-intensity cycling.

Authors:  Jens Steen Nielsen; Ernst Albin Hansen; Gisela Sjøgaard
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-03-13       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  The energetically optimal cadence decreases after prolonged cycling exercise.

Authors:  Simon Annaheim; Urs Boutellier; Götz Kohler
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 6.  The science of cycling: factors affecting performance - part 2.

Authors:  Erik W Faria; Daryl L Parker; Irvin E Faria
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Maximal lactate steady state determination with a single incremental test exercise.

Authors:  David Laplaud; Michel Guinot; Anne Favre-Juvin; Patrice Flore
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-12-10       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Performance following prolonged sub-maximal cycling at optimal versus freely chosen pedal rate.

Authors:  Ernst A Hansen; Kurt Jensen; Preben K Pedersen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-08-12       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Relation between preferred and optimal cadences during two hours of cycling in triathletes.

Authors:  S Argentin; C Hausswirth; T Bernard; F Bieuzen; J-M Leveque; A Couturier; R Lepers
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 10.  Physiological differences between cycling and running: lessons from triathletes.

Authors:  Gregoire P Millet; V E Vleck; D J Bentley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.