Literature DB >> 10683083

Warfarin is safe as secondary prophylaxis in patients with cancer and a previous episode of venous thrombosis.

R D Bona1, A D Hickey, D M Wallace.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to establish the safety and efficacy of sodium warfarin in the secondary prophylaxis of venous thrombosis in patients with cancer. This was an inception cohort study of patients enrolled in an anticoagulation clinic between July 1991 and October 1996. The rates of bleeding and recurrent thrombosis were evaluated in all the patients, and the results in patients with cancer (n = 104) were compared with those without cancer (n = 208). The rate of major hemorrhage was 0.4% and 0.3% per treatment month in the patients with cancer and those without cancer, respectively. The rates of recurrent thrombosis were 1.2% and 0.2% per treatment month in the patients with cancer compared with those without cancer, respectively. We conclude that warfarin is safe when used for the secondary prophylaxis of patients with cancer who have had a venous or arterial thrombosis, and the risk of major hemorrhage is not significantly different when compared with the risk in patients without cancer. The rate of recurrent thrombosis is approximately sixfold higher in patients with cancer being treated with warfarin for secondary prophylaxis of thrombosis compared with patients without cancer. Nonetheless, the rate of recurrent thrombosis is not overly excessive, and warfarin can be viewed as a relatively effective form of therapy for these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10683083     DOI: 10.1097/00000421-200002000-00020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  7 in total

Review 1.  The hypercoagulable state of malignancy: pathogenesis and current debate.

Authors:  Graham J Caine; Paul S Stonelake; Gregory Y H Lip; Sean T Kehoe
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 2.  Long-term use of daily subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin in cancer patients with venous thromboembolism: why hesitate any longer?

Authors:  Philippe Debourdeau; Ismail Elalamy; Axelle de Raignac; Paul Meria; Jean Marc Gornet; Yahovi Amah; Wolfang Korte; Michel Marty; Dominique Farge
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Venous thromboembolism in children with cancer - a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Alex J Walker; Matthew J Grainge; Tim R Card; Joe West; Susanna Ranta; Jonas F Ludvigsson
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 3.944

4.  Interconnections between autophagy and the coagulation cascade in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  K-D Chen; C-C Wang; M-C Tsai; C-H Wu; H-J Yang; L-Y Chen; T Nakano; S Goto; K-T Huang; T-H Hu; C-L Chen; C-C Lin
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 8.469

Review 5.  Measures of vitamin K antagonist control reported in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism studies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Mearns; Jessica Hawthorne; Ju-Sung Song; Craig I Coleman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Prognostic nomogram for 30-day mortality of deep vein thrombosis patients in intensive care unit.

Authors:  Runnan Shen; Ming Gao; Yangu Tao; Qinchang Chen; Guitao Wu; Xushun Guo; Zuqi Xia; Guochang You; Zilin Hong; Kai Huang
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 7.  Benchmark for time in therapeutic range in venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Petra M G Erkens; Hugo ten Cate; Harry R Büller; Martin H Prins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.