Literature DB >> 10682919

A quantitative approach to the evaluation of the morphological variability of two echinostomes, Echinostoma miyagawai Ishii, 1932 and E. revolutum (Frölich, 1802), from Europe.

A Kostadinova1, D I Gibson, V Biserkov, R Ivanova.   

Abstract

A comparative morphometric analysis was conducted on two European species of Echinostoma in order to examine the degree of the variability in the metrical characteristics of the adults and to assess their value in discriminating species. Adult E. miyagawai and E. revolutum, obtained experimentally, were compared using univariate and multivariate statistical analyses of 35 and 25 metrical characters, respectively. All subsets of worms of different ages represented homogeneous samples with respect to their morphometric characteristics; however, univariate analyses revealed significant differences in 22 and 23 variables between the corresponding age subsets of the two species, and it was found that the different allometric growth patterns contribute to this. The variables, body width at the posterior border of the ventral sucker, pharynx length and width, ovary length, testes length and width and length of the pre-ovarian region, exhibited isometric or positive allometric growth in E. miyagawai and negative allometry in E. revolutum. A cluster analysis based on 61 specimens and 25 variables separated E. revolutum and E. miyagawai unambiguously, producing an exact ordering of the specimens with respect to their identity and age. A forward stepwise discriminant analysis identified five variables (body width at the posterior border of ventral sucker, head collar width, length of oesophagus, width of ventral sucker and length of the pre-ovarian region) which yielded a 100% accurate classification of the two species. We suggest, therefore, that the morphometric characteristics of the adult worms should be used in studies attempting the identification of species or isolates of Echinostoma spp. More comparative data need to be gathered in order that the species boundaries within the 'revolutum' group be defined more accurately.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10682919     DOI: 10.1023/a:1006232612469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Parasitol        ISSN: 0165-5752            Impact factor:   1.431


  8 in total

1.  Studies on the life history of Echinostoma Nudicaudatum n. sp. (Echinostomatidae: Trematoda).

Authors:  P NASIR
Journal:  J Parasitol       Date:  1960-12       Impact factor: 1.276

2.  Re-validation of Echinostoma miyagawai Ishii, 1932 (Digenea: Echinostomatidae) on the basis of the experimental completion of its life-cycle.

Authors:  A Kostadinova; D I Gibson; V Biserkov; N Chipev
Journal:  Syst Parasitol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.431

3.  Life cycle of a new echinostome from Egypt, Echinostoma liei sp.nov. (Trematoda: Echinostomatidae).

Authors:  U Jeyarassasingam; D Heyneman; H K Lim; N Mansour
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 3.234

4.  The life history of Echinostoma rodriguesi sp. n. (Trematoda: Echinostomatidae).

Authors:  K C Hsu; K J Lie; P F Basch
Journal:  J Parasitol       Date:  1968-04       Impact factor: 1.276

5.  Identification and distribution of Echinostoma lindoense, E. audyi and E. revolutum (Trematoda; Echinostomatidae).

Authors:  K J Lie; I Kanev
Journal:  Z Parasitenkd       Date:  1983

6.  Observations on Echinostoma revolutum and Echinostoma trivolvis in single and concurrent infections in domestic chicks.

Authors:  B Fried; T J Mueller; B A Frazer
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.981

7.  Infectivity and growth of Echinostoma revolutum (Froelich, 1802) in the domestic chick.

Authors:  J E Humphries; A Reddy; B Fried
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.981

8.  The life cycle of Echinostoma bolschewense (Kotova, 1939) (Trematoda: Echinostomatidae).

Authors:  V Nasincová
Journal:  Folia Parasitol (Praha)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.122

  8 in total
  10 in total

1.  A re-assessment of species diversity within the 'revolutum' group of Echinostoma Rudolphi, 1809 (Digenea: Echinostomatidae) in Europe.

Authors:  Anna Faltýnková; Simona Georgieva; Miroslava Soldánová; Aneta Kostadinova
Journal:  Syst Parasitol       Date:  2015-01-04       Impact factor: 1.431

2.  Molecular characterisation of four echinostomes (Digenea: Echinostomatidae) from birds in New Zealand, with descriptions of Echinostoma novaezealandense n. sp. and Echinoparyphium poulini n. sp.

Authors:  Simona Georgieva; Isabel Blasco-Costa; Aneta Kostadinova
Journal:  Syst Parasitol       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 1.431

3.  Re-validation of Echinostoma miyagawai Ishii, 1932 (Digenea: Echinostomatidae) on the basis of the experimental completion of its life-cycle.

Authors:  A Kostadinova; D I Gibson; V Biserkov; N Chipev
Journal:  Syst Parasitol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.431

4.  A new cryptic species of Aponurus Looss, 1907 (Digenea: Lecithasteridae) from Mediterranean goatfish (Teleostei: Mullidae).

Authors:  Marta Carreras-Aubets; Aigües Repullés-Albelda; Aneta Kostadinova; Maite Carrassón
Journal:  Syst Parasitol       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 1.431

5.  The comparative development of Echinostoma caproni (Trematoda: Echinostomatidae) adults in experimentally infected hamsters and rats.

Authors:  Rafael Toledo; Ana Espert; Inés Carpena; Carla Muñoz-Antoli; Bernard Fried; José-Guillermo Esteban
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 2.289

6.  Phylogenetic relationships of Echinostoma Rudolphi, 1809 (Digenea: Echinostomatidae) and related genera re-assessed via DNA and morphological analyses.

Authors:  A Kostadinova; E A Herniou; J Barrett; D T J Littlewood
Journal:  Syst Parasitol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.431

7.  New cryptic species of the 'revolutum' group of Echinostoma (Digenea: Echinostomatidae) revealed by molecular and morphological data.

Authors:  Simona Georgieva; Christian Selbach; Anna Faltýnková; Miroslava Soldánová; Bernd Sures; Karl Skírnisson; Aneta Kostadinova
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.876

8.  Host-dependent morphology of Isthmiophora melis (Schrank, 1788) Luhe, 1909 (Digenea, Echinostomatinae)--morphological variation vs. molecular stability.

Authors:  Joanna Hildebrand; Maja Adamczyk; Zdzisław Laskowski; Grzegorz Zaleśny
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  Echinostoma 'revolutum' (Digenea: Echinostomatidae) species complex revisited: species delimitation based on novel molecular and morphological data gathered in Europe.

Authors:  Simona Georgieva; Anna Faltýnková; Rebecca Brown; Isabel Blasco-Costa; Miroslava Soldánová; Jiljí Sitko; Tomáš Scholz; Aneta Kostadinova
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Three echinostome species from wild birds in the Republic of Korea.

Authors:  Seongjun Choe; Dongmin Lee; Hansol Park; Mihyeon Oh; Hyeong-Kyu Jeon; Youngsun Lee; Ki-Jeong Na; Youngjun Kim; Hang Lee; Keeseon S Eom
Journal:  Korean J Parasitol       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 1.341

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.