Literature DB >> 10682902

Biomarkers and molecular epidemiology and chemoprevention of oral carcinogenesis.

J L Schwartz1.   

Abstract

Chemopreventives are chemicals that prevent the formation of cancers such as oral cancer. They can take the form of nutrients or synthetic molecules, and their fundamental characteristic is that they do not produce disease processes that would result in debilitating symptoms. Current evidence indicates that they function by modifying the oxidative state of transforming cells. Biomarkers can take the form of genetic and molecular indicators, which characterize the function of chemopreventives and cancer processes such as oral carcinogenesis. Biomarkers cannot provide all the required information for risk assessment or possible activity of the chemopreventives. Other methods, such as epidemiological analyses and techniques, must be used to enhance our understanding of the risk for oral cancer in human populations. One common epidemiologic method, the questionnaire, helps to determine the use and carcinogenic potential of tobacco and alcohol during oral carcinogenesis. Genetic and molecular changes in human patient populations may result in a reduction in the number and function of tumor suppressor genes. If these changes are to be assessed, the tissues (e.g., buccal mucosa) must be accessible and harvested in a reliable and consistent manner for the acquisition of DNA, mRNA, and protein. Oral tissues provide sufficient quantities of these molecules and, under stringent conditions, the quality required for the isolation of these molecular constituents. In conjunction with epidemiologic techniques, various genotypic polymorphisms, such as glutathione-S-transferase (GSTM1) or cytochrome P450 (CYP450A1), have indicated a loss in carcinogen detoxification or the processing of internal growth control signals. Biomarkers are composed of a large diverse group of genetic and molecular structures. Some of these biomarkers are indicators for programmed cell death (PCD), while others describe malignant tumor growth. Many of these classes of molecules are oxidative-responsive (e.g., tumor suppressor p53, Bcl-2, growth factors, immune-derived proteins, and death-inducing molecules) and induce PCD by triggering a cascade of cysteine proteases and regulators (e.g., caspases, death receptors). This pathway results in cell-cycle alterations and DNA fragmentation. It is hoped that a detailed knowledge of the processes involved in malignant transformation will better define the biomarker-screening tools for oral cancer. These tools will enhance our ability to predict the incidence of cancer, detect early malignant change, and quantitate chemoprevention during oral carcinogenesis. Chemopreventives such as the retinoids have already demonstrated their ability to suppress potential malignant changes in pre-malignant oral leukoplakias and decrease the incidence of second head-and-neck cancer primaries. It is our hope that this review will increase investigators' interest in developing new screening and detection systems for oral cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10682902     DOI: 10.1177/10454411000110010501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Oral Biol Med        ISSN: 1045-4411


  11 in total

1.  Proapoptotic, anti-cell proliferative, anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic potential of carnosic acid during 7,12 dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-induced hamster buccal pouch carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Duraisamy Rajasekaran; Shanmugam Manoharan; Simon Silvan; Krishnamoorthy Vasudevan; Nagarethinam Baskaran; Duraisamy Palanimuthu
Journal:  Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med       Date:  2012-10-01

2.  p53 as a prognostic marker associated with the risk of mortality for oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Tommaso Cutilli; Pietro Leocata; Vincenza Dolo; Emma Altobelli
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Oral carcinogenesis and oral cancer chemoprevention: a review.

Authors:  Takuji Tanaka; Mayu Tanaka; Takahiro Tanaka
Journal:  Patholog Res Int       Date:  2011-05-22

4.  Understanding carcinogenesis for fighting oral cancer.

Authors:  Takuji Tanaka; Rikako Ishigamori
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 4.375

Review 5.  An insight into salivary markers in oral cancer.

Authors:  Ramnarayan Belur Krishna Prasad; Akhilesh Sharma; Harsha Mysore Babu
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2013-05

6.  The c-MYC protooncogene expression in cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Enikő Palkó; Szilárd Póliska; Zsuzsanna Csákányi; Gábor Katona; Tamás Karosi; Frigyes Helfferich; András Penyige; István Sziklai
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Biomarkers and chemopreventives in oral carcinogenesis and its prevention.

Authors:  Sonalee Shah; Manpreet Kaur
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Pathol       Date:  2014-01

8.  Genotoxic assessment of chlorhexidine mouthwash on exfoliated buccal epithelial cells in chronic gingivitis patients.

Authors:  Saif Khan; Asad Ullah Khan; Sadaf Hasan
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

9.  Sources of contradictions in the evaluation of population genetic consequences after the chernobyl disaster.

Authors:  V I Glazko; T T Glazko
Journal:  Acta Naturae       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.845

10.  The significance of Epstein Barr virus (EBV) & DNA topoisomerase II alpha (DNA-Topo II alpha) immunoreactivity in normal oral mucosa, oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).

Authors:  Ali A Shamaa; Manal M Zyada; Mathias Wagner; Sally S Awad; Mohamed M Osman; Ali A Abdel Azeem
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 2.644

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.