Literature DB >> 10681887

Health, hierarchy, and social anxiety.

R G Wilkinson1.   

Abstract

This paper suggests that the main reasons why populations with narrower income differences tend to have lower mortality rates are to be found in the psychosocial impact of low social status. There is now substantial evidence showing that where income differences are greater, violence tends to be more common, people are less likely to trust each other, and social relations are less cohesive. The growing impression that social cohesion is beneficial to health may be less a reflection of its direct effects than of its role as a marker for the underlying psychological pain of low social status. Low social status affects patterns of violence, disrespect, shame, poor social relations, and depression. In its implications for feelings of inferiority and insecurity, it interacts with other powerful health variables such as poor emotional attachment in early childhood and patterns of friendship and social support. Causal pathways are likely to center on the influence that the quality of social relations has on neuroendocrine pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10681887     DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08104.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  65 in total

1.  Economic inequality is related to cross-national prevalence of psychotic symptoms.

Authors:  Sheri L Johnson; Erik Wibbels; Richard Wilkinson
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  The human ventromedial prefrontal cortex is critical for transitive inference.

Authors:  Timothy R Koscik; Daniel Tranel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Social status modulates neural activity in the mentalizing network.

Authors:  Keely A Muscatell; Sylvia A Morelli; Emily B Falk; Baldwin M Way; Jennifer H Pfeifer; Adam D Galinsky; Matthew D Lieberman; Mirella Dapretto; Naomi I Eisenberger
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Evaluating options for measurement of neighborhood socioeconomic context: evidence from a myocardial infarction case-control study.

Authors:  Gina S Lovasi; Anne Vernez Moudon; Nicholas L Smith; Thomas Lumley; Eric B Larson; Dong W Sohn; David S Siscovick; Bruce M Psaty
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 4.078

Review 5.  Subjective socioeconomic status and adolescent health: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Quon; Jennifer J McGrath
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  Integration of social epidemiology and community-engaged interventions to improve health equity.

Authors:  Nina B Wallerstein; Irene H Yen; S Leonard Syme
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Men's Mental Health: Beyond Victim-Blaming.

Authors:  Rob Whitley
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.356

8.  Shaming experiences and the association between adolescent depression and psychosocial risk factors.

Authors:  Cecilia Aslund; Kent W Nilsson; Bengt Starrin; Rickard L Sjöberg
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 4.785

9.  Subjective socioeconomic status and presence of the metabolic syndrome in midlife community volunteers.

Authors:  Stephen B Manuck; Jennifer E Phillips; Peter J Gianaros; Janine D Flory; Matthew F Muldoon
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 4.312

10.  The impact of socioeconomic status on the neural substrates associated with pleasure.

Authors:  Michael E Silverman; Peter Muennig; Xun Liu; Zohn Rosen; Martin A Goldstein
Journal:  Open Neuroimag J       Date:  2009-08-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.