A G Lawthers1, B S Rózański, R Nizankowski, A Ryś. 1. Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA. lawthers@hsph.harvard.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility of using patient reported information to create indicators of quality (access, patient experience--including satisfaction, and clinical quality) with the goal of providing Kraków city clinic managers (and potentially other audiences) with information about the quality of outpatient care in selected clinics. Setting and methods. Almost 2,000 patients from 19 outpatient clinics in Kraków, Poland were surveyed in November and December 1997 and January 1998. We prepared a self-completed questionnaire to capture data about the patient's experience with access to services, interactions with registration staff, communication with the doctor, information received from the doctor, and receipt of preventive services. RESULTS: Access varied across clinics. For example, 84% of patients waited less than 10 minutes at registration, whereas only 53% of patients waited less than 30 minutes to see the doctor. Among those who tried to register by telephone, only 72% were successful. Satisfaction was highest with the doctor visit (satisfaction=79, on a scale of 1-100) and lowest with telephone registration (satisfaction = 59). Preventive health care screening was generally disappointing, particularly for Papanicolaou smear and clinical breast examination, although frequent users of a clinic (with more opportunities for screening) generally had higher rates of screening. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the feasibility of constructing indicators of multiple dimensions of the quality of outpatient care using patient-reported information. Quality dimensions captured by survey included access, patient experience and clinical quality. Results were successfully summarized in easy to read and understand formats for clinic managers and city health department officials.
OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility of using patient reported information to create indicators of quality (access, patient experience--including satisfaction, and clinical quality) with the goal of providing Kraków city clinic managers (and potentially other audiences) with information about the quality of outpatient care in selected clinics. Setting and methods. Almost 2,000 patients from 19 outpatient clinics in Kraków, Poland were surveyed in November and December 1997 and January 1998. We prepared a self-completed questionnaire to capture data about the patient's experience with access to services, interactions with registration staff, communication with the doctor, information received from the doctor, and receipt of preventive services. RESULTS: Access varied across clinics. For example, 84% of patients waited less than 10 minutes at registration, whereas only 53% of patients waited less than 30 minutes to see the doctor. Among those who tried to register by telephone, only 72% were successful. Satisfaction was highest with the doctor visit (satisfaction=79, on a scale of 1-100) and lowest with telephone registration (satisfaction = 59). Preventive health care screening was generally disappointing, particularly for Papanicolaou smear and clinical breast examination, although frequent users of a clinic (with more opportunities for screening) generally had higher rates of screening. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the feasibility of constructing indicators of multiple dimensions of the quality of outpatient care using patient-reported information. Quality dimensions captured by survey included access, patient experience and clinical quality. Results were successfully summarized in easy to read and understand formats for clinic managers and city health department officials.