Literature DB >> 10680028

Lipid-altering efficacy and safety of simvastatin 80 mg/day: long-term experience in a large group of patients with hypercholesterolemia. World Wide Expanded Dose Simvastatin Study Group.

L Ose1, M H Davidson, E A Stein, J J Kastelein, R S Scott, D B Hunninghake, S Campodonico, W Insull, I D Escobar, H G Schrott, M E Stepanavage, M Wu, A C Tate, M R Melino, M Mercuri, Y B Mitchel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol promote the development of atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease. HYPOTHESIS: Simvastatin 80 mg/day will be more effective than simvastatin 40 mg/day at reducing LDL cholesterol and will be well tolerated.
METHODS: Two similar, randomized, multicenter, controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, 48-week studies were performed to evaluate the long-term lipid-altering efficacy and safety of simvastatin 80 mg/day in patients with hypercholesterolemia. One study conducted in the US enrolled patients meeting the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) LDL cholesterol criteria for pharmacologic treatment. In the other multinational study, patients with LDL cholesterol levels > or = 4.2 mmol/l were enrolled. At 20 centers in the US and 19 countries world-wide, 1,105 hypercholesterolemic patients, while on a lipid-lowering diet, were randomly assigned at a ratio of 2:3 to receive simvastatin 40 mg (n = 436) or 80 mg (n = 669) once daily for 24 weeks. Those patients completing an initial 24-week base study were enrolled in a 24-week blinded extension. Patients who had started on the 80 mg dose in the base study continued on the same dose in the extension, while those who had started on the 40 mg dose were rerandomized at a 1:1 ratio to simvastatin 40 or 80 mg in the extension.
RESULTS: There was a significant advantage in the LDL cholesterol-lowering effect of the 80 mg dose compared with that of the 40 mg dose, which was maintained over the 48 weeks of treatment. The mean percentage reductions (95% confidence intervals) from baseline in LDL cholesterol for the 40 and 80 mg groups were 41% (42, 39) and 47% (48, 46), respectively, for the 24-week base study, and 41% (43, 39) and 46% (47, 45), respectively, after 48 weeks of treatment (p < 0.001 between groups). Larger reductions in total cholesterol and triglycerides were also observed with the 80 mg dose compared with the 40 mg dose at Weeks 24 and 48. Both doses were well tolerated, with close to 95% of patients enrolled completing the entire 48 weeks of treatment. Myopathy (muscle symptoms plus creatine kinase increase > 10 fold upper limit of normal) and clinically significant hepatic transaminase increases (> 3 times the upper limit of normal) occurred infrequently with both doses. There was no significant difference between the groups in the number of patients with such increases, although there were more cases for both with the 80 mg dose.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the 40 mg dose, simvastatin 80 mg produced greater reductions in LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, and triglycerides. Both doses were well tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10680028      PMCID: PMC6654890          DOI: 10.1002/clc.4960230108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cardiol        ISSN: 0160-9289            Impact factor:   2.882


  7 in total

Review 1.  Quantifying effect of statins on low density lipoprotein cholesterol, ischaemic heart disease, and stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M R Law; N J Wald; A R Rudnicka
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-06-28

2.  Effects of simvastatin, an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, in patients with hypertriglyceridemia.

Authors:  Jonathan Isaacsohn; Donald Hunninghake; Helmut Schrott; Carlos A Dujovne; Robert Knopp; Stuart R Weiss; Harold Bays; John R Crouse; Michael H Davidson; Leonard M Keilson; James McKenney; Stanley G Korenman; Adrian S Dobs; Evan Stein; Ronald M Krauss; Darbie Maccubbin; Meehyung Cho; Diane J Plotkin; Yale B Mitchel
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  Promoting knowledge of statins in patients with low health literacy using an audio booklet.

Authors:  J Travis Gossey; Simon N Whitney; Michael A Crouch; Maria L Jibaja-Weiss; Hong Zhang; Robert J Volk
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.711

4.  Treatment of dyslipidemia in the elderly.

Authors:  Hong Shao; Li-Quan Chen; Jun Xu
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 5.  Fenofibrate/simvastatin fixed-dose combination in the treatment of mixed dyslipidemia: safety, efficacy, and place in therapy.

Authors:  Nicola Tarantino; Francesco Santoro; Luisa De Gennaro; Michele Correale; Francesca Guastafierro; Antonio Gaglione; Matteo Di Biase; Natale Daniele Brunetti
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2017-02-16

Review 6.  The effect of statins on testosterone in men and women, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  C Mary Schooling; Shiu Lun Au Yeung; Guy Freeman; Benjamin J Cowling
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 7.  Pathophysiological mechanisms of statin-associated myopathies: possible role of the ubiquitin-proteasome system.

Authors:  Amirhossein Sahebkar; Arrigo F G Cicero; Paolo Di Giosia; Irene Pomilio; Cosimo Andrea Stamerra; Paolo Giorgini; Claudio Ferri; Stephan von Haehling; Maciej Banach; Tannaz Jamialahmadi
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2020-08-02       Impact factor: 12.910

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.