Literature DB >> 10679801

Cyclophosphamide, etoposide, vincristine, adriamycin, and dexamethasone (CEVAD) regimen in refractory multiple myeloma: an International Oncology Study Group (IOSG) phase II protocol.

F J Giles1, N R Wickham, B L Rapoport, G Somlo, S W Lim, J Shan, A M Lynott.   

Abstract

A 4- day continuous intravenous (CIV) infusion of vincristine and doxorubicin with high-dose dexamethasone (VAD) regimen is a standard refractory multiple myeloma (MM) regimen. A Phase II study of a CEVAD regimen, i.e., VAD plus etoposide administered as a 96-hr continuous infusion, was carried out with IV bolus cyclophosphamide. Thirty-six patients were treated on study and received a total of 114 cycles of CEVAD: median 2 cycles (range 1-8). No patient achieved a CR. The overall rate of PR was 15/36 (42%). Patients achieved maximal response after a median of 4 (range 3-6) courses. PR rates were 40% (4/10) in patients with primary refractory disease, 48% (11/23) in patients with secondary refractory disease, 31% (6/19) in patients who had failed previous VAD therapy, and 50% (7/14) in patients receiving 2nd or subsequent relapse therapy. Three patients died during their initial cycle of therapy from rapidly progressive disease and sepsis. Overall median survival was 24 weeks with a 1-year survival of 33.3% ¿95% confidence interval of 20-46%¿. Myelosuppression was the most frequent adverse event with NCI grade 2 neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia in 15% of first cycles, grade 3 in 20%, and grade 4 in 65%. Two-thirds of patients had at least one episode of grade 3 or 4 sepsis. In 15% of septic episodes positive blood cultures were obtained. Overt cardiotoxicity was seen in two patients. CEVAD as used in this study was not more effective than VAD in terms of overall response rate or survival. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10679801     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8652(200003)63:3<125::aid-ajh3>3.0.co;2-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  6 in total

Review 1.  Novel agents and new therapeutic approaches for treatment of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Roberto Ria; Antonia Reale; Angelo Vacca
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2014-06-26

Review 2.  The role of bortezomib, thalidomide and lenalidomide in the management of multiple myeloma: an overview of clinical and economic information.

Authors:  Andrea Messori; Dario Maratea; Chiara Nozzoli; Alberto Bosi
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  EPOCH-F: a novel salvage regimen for multiple myeloma before reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic SCT.

Authors:  S Jamshed; D H Fowler; S S Neelapu; R M Dean; S M Steinberg; J Odom; K Bryant; F Hakim; M R Bishop
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 4.  The use of novel agents in the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.

Authors:  J P Laubach; A Mahindra; C S Mitsiades; R L Schlossman; N C Munshi; I M Ghobrial; N Carreau; T Hideshima; K C Anderson; P G Richardson
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 11.528

5.  An analysis of the utilisation of chemoprophylaxis against Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in patients with malignancy receiving corticosteroid therapy at a cancer hospital.

Authors:  L J Worth; M J Dooley; J F Seymour; L Mileshkin; M A Slavin; K A Thursky
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  STK405759 as a combination therapy with bortezomib or dexamethasone, in in vitro and in vivo multiple myeloma models.

Authors:  Gabriela Rozic; Lena Paukov; Ziv Cohen; Irit Shapira; Adrian Duek; Ohad Bejamini; Abraham Avigdor; Arnon Nagler; Igor Koman; Merav Leiba
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-07-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.